For personal reasons, I no longer feel safe working on Linux GPU drivers or the Linux graphics ecosystem. I’ve paused work on Apple GPU drivers indefinitely.

I can’t share any more information at this time, so please don’t ask for more details. Thank you.

If you think you know what happened or the context, you probably don’t. Please don’t make assumptions. Thank you.

I’m safe physically, but I’ll be taking some time off in general to focus on my health.

Well that’s sudden.

  • 𝔗𝔢𝔯 𝔐𝔞𝔵𝔦𝔪𝔞@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If the Rust maintainers keep dropping like this, I foresee Linux eventually losing its lead as an operating system. The transition to Rust is absolutely necessary, other OSs are catching up slowly but surely.

    And unlike AI, this makes an actual positive difference in maintainability and speed.

    • unexposedhazard
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      other OSs are catching up slowly but surely.

      Which ones are those? Linux is a rock, it doesnt budge it just slowly but surely does its thing. Thats why people use Linux, because it serves its purpose and it has been doing that for a while without Rust.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Rust isn’t necessary. It can be mildly helpful, but it’s also hurt in that it’s community tends to make it actively unhelpful, just like in this case.

      Linux development happened just fine for decades before rust, and while there are benefits to rust from a security point of view, if they can’t maintain the code, they’ll just go back to C and deal with process and policy for managing memory safety.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Some old fashioned c++ and c developers, like me, feel more entitled to entrench more, and see Rust as a political movement, and not a serious tool.

        I’m fairly reactionary against adding more Rust to stable projects. While I’m sure at some of that is me being old and set in my ways, the other gives people like me talking points, which may or may not help.

          • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            Ignoring your rudeness now. It’s more like I’ve seen the same wheel invented a lot of times and can recognize most tech are basically equally functional.

            I used to make fun of cobol because it has no stack; I often wondered why such a language was ever popular, why it had so many lines of code. Now, I know there was a reason it worked, why it still is used, and can appreciate how people work with it.

            I’ve made a couple of my own languages nobody uses; so new and different languages do not overawe me as much.

            Any popular language, new or old, works well enough with it having strengths and weaknesses. Some have superiority in their libraries or ecosystems and not the core. It’s ok to choose a language based on this or that. It’s ok to mix and match languages together in one project because it’s how they talk together which makes it work, and in the larger scope of things it really does not matter which is used.

            I personally have nothing against any language, including rust.

            It’s a general trend to try to fit a specific language everywhere that irritates me, I tend to see that as a software nerd’s religion or politics instead of how much better that language is.

            And so, based on the above, is why proponents of their holy language irritate the crap out of me. And rust is certainly not the first to do that