they_herd_owl_now@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · il y a 1 andedicated to ruler freudlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down127file-text
arrow-up1119arrow-down1imagededicated to ruler freudlemmy.blahaj.zonethey_herd_owl_now@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · il y a 1 anmessage-square17linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-2il y a 1 anTrue scientists understand it’s never proof, always evidence. Mathematics has proofs. Science has theories and laws that are subject to change with new evidence. Technically, all science would be ‘soft’ by the standard of those critics.
True scientists understand it’s never proof, always evidence. Mathematics has proofs. Science has theories and laws that are subject to change with new evidence. Technically, all science would be ‘soft’ by the standard of those critics.