I feel kinda bad about feeding google with data. Is there some name server I can point my servers to that upholds my privacy and does not run analytics on the requests it gets?

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel dumb for not using this along with my PiHole for my home, I only have 1 PiHole machine and I couldn’t allow myself to set it up as main DNS so I used the default ISP as a second one in case my unit stopped working (because of experience).

      • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, if you’re using Mullvad’s malware/ad filters etc there’s really no need for a PiHole in the first place (unless you’re doing some funky custom filtering).

  • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about dnscrypt-proxy?

    Randomized dns servers and you can use your own blocklists

    • notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the correct answer if you trust that your ISP isn’t snooping on your traffic. Your DNS server will send unencrypted queries to the root name servers and the nameservers of the domains you search for. This traffic is easy to detect and parse, so you do need to trust your ISP, or the provider of wherever you host your DNS server.

      If you don’t trust your ISP to that level you’ll need to trust whichever server you connect to. It’s a trade off to decide which is best for your use case.

  • cmnybo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use the DNS resolver in pfSense which connects directly to the DNS root servers.

    • Stephen304@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do the same in opnsense. According to dnsperfbench, running my own resolver benchmarked as slightly faster or at minimum about the same performance as using any of the big public resolvers. I think the only concern is to make sure you’re not using your local resolver if you’re trying to use a VPN.

    • Red@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Open DNS is run by Cisco now. And is directly used for their proprietary anti malware systems

      • returned@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the info, I’ve started using Quad9 ever since I got fiber recently and tried a DNS benchmark tool and saw it’s even faster than Cloudflare at my network

      • Red@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What do you mean?

        Uptime? DNS resolution speed?

        I’ve been using them for a good 10 years, occasionally a server goes down but then you just swap them in your config.

        I set them on my router which acts as the cache server as well. So after a client resolves it, no other clients have issues.

  • MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get what data you’re worried about feeding Google? Domain names? They have them all already, thats how they know what IP belongs to them.