whywhywhywhywhy vote

che-cigar Votes are earned.

  • RollaD20 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You do not have a morally superior position because you personally feel scared by one of the two sides of the increasingly fascistic coin of american politics. I’d argue that dismissing the immense suffering of huge swathes of the world let alone the USA in exchange for personal security is an immensely selfish (at minimum amoral) stance. Especially when that security is built on a house of cards that can be taken away at any moment when the Democrats find it “politically inconvenient” to support trans people.

    Also, yes, lots of dems are intentionally cruel, so socialists support and organize with socialist/left parties. Wild that. The binary of Republican-Democrat is such an obviously bullshit creation; it’s incredible that in the year 2023 people are still browbeating people for not caring about presidential elections. It might be worthwhile to interrogate why you think that the mass amounts of violence that the Democrats support (often, in conjunction with the Republicans or as continuation of Republican policy) can be so readily dismissed.

    If you think that voting in US Presidential Elections will make your country any better, and you are willing to ignore harm happening to the already hyper-exploited and oppressed populations of the world, then you are a misguided electoralist - a morally tenuous position at best.

    • kool_newt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do not have a morally superior position because you personally feel scared by one of the two sides

      I have a morally superior position because I’m trying to reduce harm while you’re trying to get your party into power.

      • RollaD20 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        while you’re trying to get your party into power.

        Said the individual campaigning for votes for dems.

        If you and the people you are organizing with (I’m sure you organize irl) decide to engage in entryism. Good for you, hope it goes well. I’ll tell you, historically, it typically doesn’t go great.

        Newsom literally just vetoed a bill to protect trans kids in california despite overwhelming democrat representation and approval, that’s the most recent ratfuckery the democrats have pulled in a long line of them. You’re telling people to run for office? Tell me what happened to Bernie, an extremely milquetoast left option but still too disruptive to DNC corporate interest.

        I agree with you people should vote, they should vote for third parties. they should communicate to political institutions that what we have is not working. But too many Americans have latched onto their dumb sports team red-blue politics game rather than trying to actually understand what political power is materially, theoretically, and historically. If we do engage in entryism (we shouldn’t) it should be organized so as not to get subsumed and crushed. If you are personally compelled to vote for the democrats out of personal interest, I will not stop you. But I am not interested in crumbs dusted from the table.

        • kool_newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Said the individual campaigning for votes for dems.

          Because Dems are less (“LESS” not “NOT”) harmful to minorities and will make my job of trying to end capitalism less risky. I don’t care about Democratic power itself. If you have a better idea to reduce harm I’d like to hear it. I’m pretty sure revolution is going to hurt many vulnerable people.

          Newsom literally just vetoed a bill to protect trans kids in california despite overwhelming democrat representation and approval

          First off, you’ll notice people calling this a “betrayal”, because they expected more from a Democrat, this and worse would be typical and expected for a Republican. Second of all, I didn’t read the law but read Newsom’s note about it and kinda agree. Newsom is not motivated by trans hate lol.

          You’re telling people to run for office? Tell me what happened to Bernie

          You give up that easy? Good luck trying to revolt against the world!

          I agree with you people should vote, they should vote for third parties.

          Math doesn’t give a shit about opinions, voting third party in our system is a losing proposition. Use it for signalling in safe districts.