• MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That actually almost seems worse. He is not paying into Social Security or his local community. He is being generously compensated on stock, which is taxed differently.

    Edit: I do want to thank you for providing that link. I was only finding a Forbes article about him being the highest compensated CEO of that year.

      • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Borrowing against stock needs to stop yesterday, especially if it’s not specifically for the interests of the company whose stock is being used.