Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has launched yet another attack at the trans community by saying that people âcanât be any sex they want to be.â
He made the remarks during his closing speech at the 2023 Conservative Party conference on Wednesday (4 October) afternoon.
At one point, Sunak said that people shouldnât be âbullied into believing people can be any sex they want to beâ as he made clear his stance on trans people.
âWe are going to change this country and that means, life means life. That shouldnât be a controversial position. The vast majority of hard-working people agree with it,â he began. âWe shouldnât get bullied into believing people can be any sex they want to be. They canât,â â Rishi Sunak
âIt also shouldnât be controversial for parents to know what their children are learning in school about relationships.
âPatients should know when hospitals are talking about men or women,â which was met with a large applause.
He went on: âWe shouldnât get bullied into believing people can be any sex they want to be. They canât.â
âA man, is a man, and a woman, is a woman, that is just common sense,â he added, to yet more noise from Tories in attendance.
Many on social media site X (formerly known as Twitter) reacted to the comments, accusing Sunak of making âpersistent attacksâ and labelling him âdisgracefulâ. âA man, is a man, and a woman, is a womanâ
One wrote in response: âTrying to distract people from his governmentâs corruption and incompetence by attacking some of the most vulnerable people in society. Vile.â
Needlessly stirring up hatred where it is unjustified to make a cheap political dig, before going on to claim the country is wonderful because of its tolerance. Disgraceful excuse for a PM,â another went on to add.
Sunak can go and do one. Pandering to middle class transphobes isnât the election winner you think it is,â someone else echoed.
âThe persistent attacks on not only one of the smallest but most at risk communities is vile. Absolutely disgusting party through and through including anyone who supports them,â a social media user weighed in.
It comes after Health Secretary Steve Barclay outlined plans yesterday (3 October) to ban trans women from accessing female NHS wards.
This has since been backed by other senior Tories such as Home Secretary Suella Braverman.
LGBTQ+ charity Stonewall criticised the announcement, labelling it a âcynical attempt to look busyâ instead of actually improving womenâs healthcare.
Addressing party members in Manchester, Mr Barclay said: âWe need a common-sense approach to sex and equality issues in the NHS â that is why today I am announcing proposals for clearer rights for patients.
âAnd I can today confirm that sex-specific language has now been fully restored to online health advice pages about cervical and ovarian cancer and the menopause.
âIt is vital that womenâs voices are heard in the NHS and the privacy, dignity and safety of all patients are protected.â
The post Rishi Sunak says people âcanât be any sex they want to beâ in new swipe at trans community appeared first on Attitude.
As someone who is not LGBTQ+ but is trying to understand it myself, the biggest key to âgetting itâ is separating sex and gender. Sex would be your biological make up, regardless of genital configuration. Thatâs your classic XX vs XY vs the rare ânon-standardâ. Itâs important to note that there are multiple types of different physical configurations that are âmale or femaleâ - Anatomical, Hormonal, Chromosomal, and Cellular - and they frequently do not line up 100%.
Gender is separate from this as a mental construct/thought pattern. For most people, these two things line up, and that is your standard Cis person. A Trans person is where their mental configuration does not match their physical configuration. When this causes significant mental distress we call it gender dysphoria. For the rest, we call it being Trans, non-Binary or something else.
Why would there be a difference between gendered wards in the quality of the care? Health care is tailored to the patient, where in the hospital they are located shouldnât affect it.
Healthcare is tailored to the patient, and thus the specialists in the flavour of healthcare needed are assigned to the relevant wards. Itâs a recipe for medical mistakes if the patients get mixed
When I was in hospital I was on a floor devoted to ailments of the leg and foot. This was divided up into wards of 5 with them being all male or all female. The only difference in treatment between the wards (as far as I could tell) is there was a male nurse as part of the team overseeing two wards (one high visibility, one standard). Iâd imagine he would have been able to provide the same level of care on a female ward but it could possibly have been handy to have him on male wards for the older,. possibly more confused, patients who might accept more direct instructions from a male nurse. However, I saw no evidence for this.
What are you on about? When I (a woman) got eye surgery and put on a mixed ward afterwards to recover, how did it affect my treatment?
Ah sorry, I didnât realise that eyes were especially different between the sexes