spujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish Ā· 8 months agorulelemmy.cafeimagemessage-square99linkfedilinkarrow-up1632arrow-down112
arrow-up1620arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.cafespujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish Ā· 8 months agomessage-square99linkfedilink
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1Ā·8 months agonah. sure, it might be called āunderstandable,ā just as any cycle of violence has a predictable, āunderstandableā tendency to repeat. that doesnāt make it acceptable, though. this quote isnāt from 1946. a quick search shows that israeli forces first used tanks extensively around 1973. this situates KertĆ©szās remarks not just in response to the Holocaust, but in the context of over two decades of the Nakba, displacement, destruction, occupation, and the early stages of apartheid against 1.4 million Palestinians. i donāt see evidence that KertĆ©sz was a zealous zionist, but this quoteāgiven the atrocity lurking behind the wordsāis definitely worthy of interrogation and critique. that kind of questioning is part of universal healing, understanding, and growth.
nah. sure, it might be called āunderstandable,ā just as any cycle of violence has a predictable, āunderstandableā tendency to repeat. that doesnāt make it acceptable, though.
this quote isnāt from 1946. a quick search shows that israeli forces first used tanks extensively around 1973. this situates KertĆ©szās remarks not just in response to the Holocaust, but in the context of over two decades of the Nakba, displacement, destruction, occupation, and the early stages of apartheid against 1.4 million Palestinians.
i donāt see evidence that KertĆ©sz was a zealous zionist, but this quoteāgiven the atrocity lurking behind the wordsāis definitely worthy of interrogation and critique. that kind of questioning is part of universal healing, understanding, and growth.