Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 个月前Inspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up1446arrow-down19
arrow-up1437arrow-down1imageInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 个月前message-square34linkfedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·6 个月前In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·6 个月前Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·6 个月前Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.
In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.