Poplar?@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoRulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1253arrow-down112
arrow-up1241arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.worldPoplar?@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square30linkfedilink
minus-squareNotSteve_@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month agoDo you know what the impact of that is?
minus-squarecassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 month agoI’m sure it’s fine; wasn’t doing anything important
minus-squarethen_three_more@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month ago The implications of this change in the inner core’s movement for Earth’s surface can only be speculated. Vidale said the backtracking of the inner core may alter the length of a day by fractions of a second: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/06/240613161147.htm
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoIs that enough to be problematic for GNSS?
minus-squareinfinitesunrise@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoNo, the Earth’s spin rate is always changing in very tiny ways and global positioning systems update regularly to account for this.
minus-squarethen_three_more@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoArticle says it’s so small it’s likely lost in other variations, so it doesn’t seem like it would be.
minus-squareVegafjord eo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoIf the days last longer, thats a plus in my book.
Do you know what the impact of that is?
I’m sure it’s fine; wasn’t doing anything important
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/06/240613161147.htm
Is that enough to be problematic for GNSS?
No, the Earth’s spin rate is always changing in very tiny ways and global positioning systems update regularly to account for this.
Article says it’s so small it’s likely lost in other variations, so it doesn’t seem like it would be.
If the days last longer, thats a plus in my book.