Edit: Replaced with Reuters link (Israel National News has a “mixed” factual reporting rating similar to Al Jazeera).

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they blow it up, there’s no way to prove they’re wrong.

      If they go on foot, people are going to ask where the proof is that they were right.

      So I’ll be very surprised if they ever go in on foot.

      • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they go in on foot, they’re at much higher risk of being murdered by Hamas terrorists. On top of that, people like you will condemn them for going in and raiding a hospital.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s murder when it’s civilians…

          If an invading enemy military force suffers casualties… That’s war.

          Not exactly complicated

          • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Those soldiers have families at home that are at risk because of these terrorists. Why should their lives be risked as well because the scummy terrorists use hospitals and civilians as human shields?

            • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              When an opposing force uses human shields, you aren’t supposed to attack the fucking human shields. You’re supposed to show you value human life and try another way. If you kill the human shields, it’s a war crime.

              Especially since everything in Gaza seems to be a “human shield.” You don’t get to just bomb tunnels through a hospital without people calling you a war criminal.

              • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Moral dilemmas aside. Killing human shields or collateral is actually not a war crime. Using human shields is. People are throwing around that term without thinking.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Several soldiers on foot would be a LOT better for the hospital than a missile if that is really all they are looking for, although that doesn’t seem to fit with what they’ve done so far

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also sounds exactly like something a terrorist org would do. Both sides seem to be competing for who I should dislike more.

      • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not just would do. It’s a known fact with plenty of evidence that Hamas stores and fires rockets from schools and hospitals.

  • dingleberry
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reuters is hardly a neutral source itself.