• blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m still in favour of ditching school uniforms entirely and just mandating that they can’t have any branding on their clothes.

    If schools want to have a uniform, they should pay for it and not charge the parents.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I agree that schools should pay for it, but not that they should be ditched.

      I didnt realise how rich some of my friends were until I went to their house. The uniform made us all equals in the classroom

      • MBech@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        There was no doubt in my school in NZ who was poor and who wasn’t, based on how someone’s clothes fit them or how worn they were. The youngest in a poor family would have some very worn clothes that had been passed down from their siblings. Often 2 sizes too big or too small.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          right, which is a real issue for the parents having to buy the uniforms every year. Im wishing for an ideal scenario where the school is tasked with trading in/out uniforms year after year and the parents just wash them

          • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Will not stop wealthy parents buying new.

            Will just take burden of poor while continuing to hilight the difference in quality.

            • tetris11@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              I agree it wont place a top cap on wealth displays, but it will raise the bottom cap

              Being judged for my mum “shopping at Netto” is still better than being judged for my mum not affording groceries at all. (Netto being the school’s theoretical free distribution network, and groceries being the uniforms in this regretful metaphor)

            • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              If the school are providing it then that sets a lower floor for how bad it can be. Currently poor kids will just keep wearing it until there are too many holes for it to work as clothing or they run out of siblings to pass it down to.

              • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                You may want to look at school funding and the attitude of the last 1t years of government to such.

                Before considering that the future of school provided uniforms will be any newer or in any better condition.

                • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Everyone will get equally shit clothing, at least everyone will be equal. I mean that is the entire point we keep getting told we need uniforms in the first place…

      • thehatfox@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I didnt realise how rich some of my friends were until I went to their house. The uniform made us all equals in the classroom

        Uniforms have never done that in my experience, because there are plenty of wealth signifiers outside of uniforms kids will still notice (pencil cases, bags, PE trainers, mobile phones etc), and even the uniforms themselves are not worn equally. The rich kids have clean uniforms that get regular replaced each term, the poor ones had dirty and ill fitting hand-me-downs.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yes but these will be minor differences (check out my clean school mandated tennis shoes) as opposed to major ones (check out my £3,000 nikes)

            • tetris11@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              i cant either, but my 16 year old material obsessed cousin definitely can, and he’s way more representative of the population than I am

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Because it isn’t the 1800s anymore? Why are schools pushing so far backwards now. When I went to school it was a jumper with the school logo on it, quite a bit cheaper to buy than the kinds of stuff schools are insisting on these days.

    You could even buy your own plain jumper in the right colour and sew the badge on it.