This is definitely not the correct takeaway from what I was saying, and honestly reads like something that a right wing grifter would say as a jab at pro-choice.
i wasn’t taking that from you i was saying it doesn’t matter because the bodily autonomy of the parent survives regardless of any status given to a fetus. we also see this in the violinist analogy.
I believe their unstated point was that nobody can be forced to violate their bodily autonomy to save another person’s life. You cannot be required to donate a kidney, for example. The bans and hullabaloo around abortion are the sole (hypocritical) exception.
This is definitely not the correct takeaway from what I was saying, and honestly reads like something that a right wing grifter would say as a jab at pro-choice.
i wasn’t taking that from you i was saying it doesn’t matter because the bodily autonomy of the parent survives regardless of any status given to a fetus. we also see this in the violinist analogy.
I believe their unstated point was that nobody can be forced to violate their bodily autonomy to save another person’s life. You cannot be required to donate a kidney, for example. The bans and hullabaloo around abortion are the sole (hypocritical) exception.