• johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    I can’t feel excited about this This feels like part of a new US expansionist agenda.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Please don’t let it be cancelled and returned early because of a toilet That would just be too much. This is the first thing that has made me legitimately excited since having to unexpectedly say goodbye to my soul-dog last month. I need this, dammit.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    whew. i’ve rolled the dice on my life, but i’ve never gotten on a boeing spacecraft. and the shitter’s already clogged.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Right, my mistake. Shitter is clogged tho. Seriously. I know how to design a clogproof shitter (you need a mashing stick) and look what they did.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Space toilets are complicated. They don’t have gravity assisting the flush. You’d be surprised how even simple stuff we take for granted on Earth is complex when you take away gravity.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            yeah i am making a little fun because oh my gods why did they not consult the spends their entire life on the toilet community because we can solve any toilet clogging problem with a wire hangar.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Can’t we get a single article without mentioning how shitty the U.S is right now? Half of the comments here aren’t even ontopic.

    Going back to the moon is still an engineering feat, even if we’ve done it before. That was a generation ago, and all of those engineers are retired or about to.

    • TransNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m surprised that Trump didn’t sign an EO declaring that it was now the Trump space mission rather than Artemis II.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t care what we call it, as long as we keep funding the science and engineering. The amount of people who don’t understand why we should do this stuff is astounding. And I’m honestly not the best at articulating why we should do it.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Can’t we get a single article without mentioning how shitty the U.S is right now?

      So you concede this is all about distraction.

      Let’s discover antibiotics again!

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I mean I kinda see manned missions as pointless. I would like us to remotely create destinations before going through the added expense of people and I think the technology gains would be bigger.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’m going to ignore the obvious Kindergarten joke (which I’ve made myself).

            I would be happy to send a probe to Uranus. We know a lot less about the outer planets bcz we’ve really only done a few flybys of them.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          now we just need the construction of destinations. we are well on our way tom completing the initial preliminary work before we start what should be the main effort.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t see the point of sending people to the moon or Mars. It will always be insanely expensive to do anything there, always. What is there to discover that can’t be done with robots? Doing it for the poetic sake of doing it--“going where no man has gone before”-- seems impractical and wasteful.

      Yes, we’ve done it in the past, exploring, that doesn’t mean we must keep doing it as it becomes more impractical, and with what benefits, exactly? Exploiting whatever resources are there? Is that really what we should be doing?

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, why do things! Let’s just sit on our ass and stagnate!

          Let’s do the same thing over and over again and call it progress! Next time you are in a hospital watching a loved one dying of cancer, you can tell them how many times we flew around the moon!

          We can’t breathe, the earth is on fire…let’s do another moon victory lap!

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The moon is a good stopping off point for the rest of the solar system. Launching interplanetary missions from the moon is much easier assuming a moon base exists

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Why waste billions when we can waste trillions!

          you guys realize NASA probes have already gone beyond the solar system?

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Im on the same page. I feel we should concentrate on discovery with probes or rovers and such and automation. trying to mine something robotically on an asteroid. if we can do that then see if we can smelt it. See if we can create fuel in space and such. I don’t think we will progress at all till we can be sourcing and manufacturing in space.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            if thats the case then going into space is rediculous because if we at some point can’t source and build our there then there is no future out there.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    America, fast going backwards, has today reached 1969 1968, assuming that this mission succeeds.

    (Edit: this is not even a moon landing so more Apolo 8 than Apolo 11).

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A truly pointless waste of money. This is what we did with all the cancer research money cut from NIH.

      While Whitey’s on the moon.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Right, it’s definitely this and not the 200 billion dollar budget of ICE, or all the resources going towards the war in Iran right now.

      • chinaski@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Terrible take. A lot of what we know in science is due to NASA research. NASA is <0.5% of the federal budget. There are plenty of egregious things we are wasting money on to be upset about - this is not one of them.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          NASA is <0.5% of the federal budget

          that’s <0.5% more than cancer research.

          A lot of what we know in science is due to NASA research

          Someone not in STEM would say this. NASA has some important projects, this is not one of them.

          Sending up this rocket accomplishes NOTHING. This is an idiot project based on moon colony fantasy and a way to shovel more tax $ to Elon Musk and SpaceX while people clap and holler like idiots.

          This poem from 1970 illustrates exactly how far the US has progressed in 55 years:

          A rat done bit my sister Nell.

          (with Whitey on the Moon)

          Her face and arms began to swell.

          (and Whitey’s on the Moon)

          I can’t pay no doctor bill.

          (but Whitey’s on the Moon)

          Ten years from now I’ll be paying still.

          (while Whitey’s on the Moon)

          Except we can update 10 years to 20 years.

        • BrioxorMorbide@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And a lot of the NASA science budget was cut because it was too boring for the toddler administration who want to play with their flashy toys.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            the budget was moved over to SpaceX on the lie of private sector efficiency. But to the credit of SpaceX, they did blow up more rockets than the inefficient NASA ever did.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It was largely restored under the 2026 congressional budget at levels similar to 2025. The trump administration tried to punish centers in blue states by taking away their funding, the worst of which was Goddard with a 50% budget cut. Basically they tried to cancel nearly every earth observing science mission, which is Goddards bread and butter.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They launched the integrity of the USA off the planet, so it won’t bother them anymore for a few days.

  • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    omfg can yous not enjoy a moon mission without falling into doomerism and talking about the epstein files

    • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If I’ve learned anything from realistic space fiction, it’s that they won’t find any up there.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        we can also just look at who are currently the faces of the private space race, and their beliefs and how they run their companies

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Very often, I was like “I don’t think I need to watch this shuttle launch, they might have to scrub it” and then they’d actually launch and I was was like “damn, I should have watched that shuttle launch”.

    So I was like “naaah, I don’t think I need to watch this launch, they might scrub it” and now it looks like they’ve launched and I was like “shit, I fell for that again, I’m really stupid”

    • JATth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 minutes ago

      I watched the live stream of the launch. You never know what happens until the rocket has reached space. From significant past launches was the launch of JWST, that was truly nerve racking and exciting, although no people were on the board.

      Hopefully nothing will break, and we perhaps get a moon base in this century. (we do have more urgent things to research, but space research tends to produce more eye-opening and unexpected results.)

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The shuttle is Lucy holding the football and you live in a Charlie Brown world. ✌

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yeah, but MAGAs believe the earth is flat and space is Fake News, so the administration is walking a fine line as regards speaking about it.