• GardenGeek@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Imho: China might be waiting to take Taiwan once the US ammo stocks are emptied due to sheer idiocy.

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      30 days ago

      And preparing to sell more solar panels and EVs if oil production in the region gets lasting damage

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had this thought, though China has been very obvious with their movements lately. I’d more suspected they were doing it try have the US back down on the Strait by reminding them of the South China Sea.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        30 days ago

        China has been very obvious with their movements lately.

        In a world of unpredictability and uncertainty, presenting your country as stable and certain is extremely profitable.

    • stumu415@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      30 days ago

      China is not invading Taiwan. I wish people would stop regurgitating this BS and actually see what is happening politically within China. Because the US is just recklessly invading other countries - 2 this year alone - you don’t need to project this on China.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    They’ve burned a century of soft power and international goodwill in 18 months.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    30 days ago

    It almost feels like it’s a purposeful boondoggle to waste the country’s military resources on nothing, leaving it toothless and helpless.

      • Bazell@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        30 days ago

        It really is. It is very hard to destroy it from the outside, since it was build like a castle.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        It’s very profitable, so of course nothing is being done against him, the state religion of the USA begets that profit is more important than the country

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        30 days ago

        that’s the only positive.
        that violent shit country has been at war most of its existence under any president.
        another war and US war crimes is nothing new.
        nothing would please me more with it gone, the world would be a better place.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          You were not alive during the early 90s and don’t remember what it was like to have a massive geopolitical vacuum after the fall of the ussr, do you

          • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            Another wrong assumption.
            I have seen pizza boy Gorbachev the traitor followed by Yeltsin sell-out and the devastating effects.
            US vultures and the west massively leeching on them and stealing resources.
            The population suffering heavily. And no, it wasn’t that ‘they had trouble adjusting to capitalism’ as it was sold by the US mouthpieces.
            A horrible period until Putin put a stop to it when he got refused entry into NATO and realized the US doesn’t want peace, only subservient vassals to exploit.

            Is the world going in to chaos without the corrupt policeman of the world?
            That’s simply cheap scaremongering.
            90% of the world’s problems are directly related to the US meddling everywhere.
            So what exactly is your point other than confirming mine?

  • RedFrank24@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Is it really 14 years worth of missiles if you use them in 30 days in an actual war? Surely you measure your ‘days’ worth of missiles based on expected usage in scenarios where you actually have to use them? So in reality, they used 30 days worth of missiles in 30 days, they just massively underestimated how many missiles they’d need in those 30 days.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’d say it depends on if you’re using the missiles effectively.

      Targeting elementary schools because the hallucination machine you decided to give command and control authorization told you to, is not effective use.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      30 days ago

      The US fired 850+ Tomahawk cruise missiles in 30 days but purchased only 57 in the FY2026 budget. That is 14.9 years of production consumed in a single month.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      Sadly, as always, the increase is already priced in. It was before any announcement was made of an attack. They tell their friends to buy, then they announce it and they make a nice profit.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    US citizens have suffered under awful social safety nets and a lack of universal healthcare for the trade-off of at least having a massive unstoppable military. Here we are though with its dwindling amount of munitions and the rest of the world pissed at it. It seems the US wasn’t that different from Russia in that they both have a lack of military hardware for a sustained conflict.