It’s actually the other way around. There are only 11 two-party consent states. All the rest, plus DC are single-party consent, but usually the single consenting party has to be one of the participants of the conversation.
Most states require two party consent to record audio otherwise it’s wiretapping.
That was before multi-billions dollars companies found a way to monetize this. Then they’ll intensively lobby pay lawmakers to amend the laws so that either cars get a waiver or starting up the car will be considered as a consent.
Wait, so regular “lip reading” is looking at someone’s lips to determine what they’re saying.
Add “acoustic” and it involves sound. So… sound-based lip reading? Isn’t that just recording something with a microphone with the “lip reading” part being unnecessary?
“acoustic lip reading”? Reading lips by sound waves wouldn’t they just put a microphone in there?
Theres probably sone regulation against actually just recording the conversation…
But they’re doing that too… for “ad monetization”
Ad selection may be local to the device.
Most states require two party consent to record audio otherwise it’s wiretapping.
Acoustic ultrasonic distance mapping isn’t counted as wiretapping. They aren’t recording your speech, they’re inferring your speech.
It’s actually the other way around. There are only 11 two-party consent states. All the rest, plus DC are single-party consent, but usually the single consenting party has to be one of the participants of the conversation.
inb4 “By buying this vehicle, you consent to use recording every interaction you have within and outside the cab.”
That was before multi-billions dollars companies found a way to monetize this. Then they’ll intensively
lobbypay lawmakers to amend the laws so that either cars get a waiver or starting up the car will be considered as a consent.Wait, so regular “lip reading” is looking at someone’s lips to determine what they’re saying.
Add “acoustic” and it involves sound. So… sound-based lip reading? Isn’t that just recording something with a microphone with the “lip reading” part being unnecessary?
Maybe they mean using laser to observe acoustics moving an object like a window?
What does that have to do with lips?
It’s metonymy, maybe?