• TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What we need to do is get rid of FPTP, because so long as that’s how the system works breaking away will only guarantee that the fascists win permanently.

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the sad fact is many people in the US are okay with financing genocide as long as they don’t have to hear Trump’s name or suffer any consequences personally. As long as some kind of right wing boogeymany exists, you can convince most democratic voters that genocide is permissable enough to not disqualify a candidate.

          • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the sad thing is people thinking that if it were Trump instead of Biden right now, there wouldn’t be any genocide. When in fact trump would be supporting genocide both in Gaza and in Ukraine.

            • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So how much genocide in your opinion is okay to vote for under the suspicion that someone else might also do a genocide?

              Because either you’re admitting theres no way to vote ourselves out of genocide or that joes genocides is okay because someone else MAY also preside over genocide. Thats a new one, this genocide is acceptable because if it wasn’t this, it would just be another genocide, do I have that right?

              Im of the opinion that I cannot materially support genocide. Call it single issue voterism if you want but to me never again means never again, not never again unless maybe the someone else would also finance genocide. Having boundaries is healthy and just, and if genocide is only a soft boundary for someone then I place no value in what they have to say.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We’d still get genocide regardless of who the president is. The killing machine operates the same no matter who pulls the levers.

              I won’t vote for genocide.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No it’s not.

                  Their point was that liberals are okay with genocide under Democrats, but if Trump was president they’d be against it. No one thinks that, if Trump were president, there wouldn’t be a genocide. The genocide is non negotiable.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you prefer

          1. Genocide, drone strikes, mass deportations, legal abortion, Supreme Court judges who aren’t having massive ethics scandals, regulations, etc

          or

          1. Genocide, drone strikes, mass deportation, abortion bans, Supreme Court judges with giant ethics scandals, deregulation, tax cuts for billionaires, etc?

          Both parties are similarly shitty on some things, but are pretty different on other issues. Are you really indifferent to all the issues they differ on?

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re oversimplifying.

            Under Trump, Democrats would oppose genocide. I guarantee if Trump was president the Democrats would be fighting against him.

            Under Biden, even Bernie is falling in line. It’s disgusting.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re there to sheepdog the voters into believing progressive candidates a valued part of the democratic party despite the fact that more than most of the good things progressives have accomplished are entirely outside of the chambers of congress. The democrats refuse to work with progressives unless they are forced too, like that time the progressives asked Pelosi to consider stock trading bans and she denied them until it was clear that was horrible PR, then decided to come around to vocally supporting it later, once the political will to pass the bill was dying down. Progressives are there for show.

            • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think he endorsed a ceasefire but then immediately expressed he didn’t think Hamas would respect a ceasefire.

              So one step forward, one step back. Not much better. Not great. But I dont expect the over 70 crowd to navigate these waters very well.

              Fetterman is the far more disappointing Senator on this topic.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m willing to bet that he’d navigate these waters just fine if Trump was president.

                That’s what Trump does. He sharpens the contradictions and makes it obvious to everyone. Biden does everything possible to muddy the waters and make the issue seem more complicated than it actually is, but Trump never bothers masking his intentions like that.

                • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Maybe so. Though the reality isn’t that Trump is president.

                  And I am not sure anyone knows for sure how a 2nd term Trump would be acting right now. I mean hell, Trump kind of criticized Israel and said Hezbollah was making a smart move recently, so hey, wild card factor would be without much masking.

                  Not sure I’d have much expection for the geriatric leaders regardless of president, still.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already did. Though they absolutely 100% need to stop voting for that dogshit party as well.

      • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, insurrectionist part II electric boogaloo.

        The choices on the table are dogshit or arsonic, but if you don’t choose you’re still going to have to eat one of them.

        In order to avoid eating either, we should probably focus on getting the one off the table that will fucking kill you.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just don’t eat either of them? It’s not hard. You simply go eat something else and ridicule people who are eating the dogshit.

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              That would be cool. But no I’m just not going to eat dog shit. Millions of other foods, and hundreds of other candidates, I don’t get any bonus points by voting for the winner. It’s literally the least you can do.

              • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Biden is the president whether or not you individually voted for him. You’re figuratively eating dogshit right now. Be glad it isn’t arsonic.