• ColeSloth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe. I would imagine that having all the portions built at one location and shipped/installed at the site would be quicker and have less variation in final cost.

    The last US nuclear power plant built wound up being 7 years late and a face shattering $17,000,000,000 over budget. Who wants something to take an extra unexpected 7 years to have something built and pay seventeen billion dollars more than you planned on to get it?

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Less land required as well which is also cheaper.

      But ya, being and to produce them in a factory was going to be a big savings. They’d get cheaper as things improved.