I remember there was a bug (or intended behavior?) of people getting their accounts banned for certain kinds of mundane chat messages in live streams and I’m a little spooked that the same will happen with the recent escalation in the adblocking arms race.

  • Wertheimer [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    The passive-aggressive "I’m just a smol bean multinational media conglomerate and you’ve blocked ads on my page deeper-sadness " messages that sometimes make it through my adblocker certainly feel like a precursor to more punitive action.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sometimes I get those pop ups when I’m reading news from outlets with millionaire pundits like CNN or NBC, and I always gleefully click on “I’ll disable my adbloxker next time”

      • chop
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s part of the concern. We never even see the warnings, but they still know we’re blocking ads. Next they shrug and lock our accounts, because “but muh ad revenueee!”

  • IgnacioM@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess there’s a chance but i think the backlash would be massive. People’s entire lives are on google

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read a post-cyberpunk novel a few years back called Moxyland. If you evaded arrest they didn’t put a warrant out. They just rescinded all your permissions and deactivated your phone. Then you either turned yourself in, or starved to death because there was no way to interact with society without your phone.

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have said no but then Twitter started charging it’s users so now I’m pretty sure literally anything is possible

    • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Seems like it would be absolutely cutting off a limb to remedy an ingrown nail. If people have to start shopping around for alternatives it will start eroding their market dominance and user base. I’m really curious what percentage of people have installed ad blockers since they’ve started trying to clamp down on Youtube.

        • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I remember like the better part of a decade ago my sister was putting on some slop for my nephews and I asked why she didn’t have an ad blocker “Can you get in trouble for that?” “Yes. The internet gestapo will immediately kick down your door.”

    • ped_xing [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did that actually go into effect yet? I only remember it being floated as a possibility. When I searched “x price” to find out how much they’re charging, the results were a demonstration of how bad of a name “X” is:

      1. Price of US Steel (NYSE: X)
      2. Price of the X coin
      3. Coin
      4. US Steel
      5. XPRIZE, an engineering contest thing partially funded by melon-musk
      6. Tesla Model X
      7. Coin
      8. Coin
      9. XPRIZE
      10. iPhone X

      Anyway, after refining my search, it looks like requiring a paid subscription to post is being piloted in New Zealand and the Philippines.

      • StellarTabi [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love how twitter had one of the best brand names, I mean it’s just good in general, but it’s also builtup and maxed it, fully SEO’d, everyone knows it, it’s short, it’s history is long, it’s the level 100 legendary pokemon of brand names, but then he replaces it with a level 5 magikarp.

        That’s not to mention the SEO ambiguity of X (from your keyboard) or this weird other symbol 𝕏.

  • chickentendrils [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably not, but if you’re really concerned the way I view YT is probably worth doing. mpv/youtube-dl (yt-dlp) while grabbing links from the browser but never actually viewing a video in it. I have a way to autoplay videos in mpv when clicked in my browser, there’s also browser add-ons like ff2mpv

  • GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s possible, but personally I never use my account when using youtube anymore. I just remember the channels I like and check if they’ve posted anything, and if something is age-gated, I just use youtube-dlp (yt-dlp) to rip the video without having to engage with google accounts.

  • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends on how many users are actually using an adblocker. Last I saw, about 10 million users were using Ublock or adblockers in general. If we assume that reflects the real number of users, then it’s a tiny percentage of Google product users and banning them isn’t that big of a deal - unless large companies also use adblockers in which case, it’s probably easier to surrender than to keep fighting.