• Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shouldn’t the 300,000 serve more purpose being sent to the victims?

    • Maiznieks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Empty, useless, rhetoric, sounds like You’re trying to shame either those that donated or the receiver. There’s no good way to confirm it would (serve more purpose), but anyway - people donated to the cause that was set. There’s nothing that would prevent to create another fund raising for victims too.

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        The fact that you think I’m shaming anyone speaks volumes about how there’s things you need to fix about yourself.

        I said nothing about the quality of character of those donating, or the man that received donations- only that maybe the actual victims could use the money more…

        You know- for hospital bills and therapy?

        Fix yourself.

          • Pratai@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You think their future treatment won’t come with a cost?

              • Pratai@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Fixed it. Didn’t pay attention to autocorrect. Thats what I get for typing in 30° temperature.