• ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is why I’ve argued that we shouldn’t be calling these things “AI”

    True artificial intelligence wouldn’t have these problems as it’d be able to learn very quickly all the nuance in language and comprehension.

    This is virtual intelligence (VI) which is designed to seem like it’s intelligent by using certain parameters with set information that is used to calculate a predetermined response.

    Like autocorrect trying to figure out what word you’re going to use next or an interactive machine that has a set amount of possible actions.

    It’s not truly intelligent it’s simply made to seem intelligent and that’s not the same thing.

    • fallingcats
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is it not artificial intelligence as long as it doesn’t match the intelligence of a human?

    • HelloHotel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago
      rambling

      We currently only have the tech to make virtual intelligence, what you are calling AI is likely what the rest of the world will call General AI (GAI) (an even more inflated name and concept)

      I dont beleve we are too far off from GAI. GAI is to AI what Rust is to C. Rust is magical compared to C but C will likely not be forgotten completely due to rust Rust