Buying a family-sized home with three or more bedrooms used to be manageable for young people with children. But with home prices climbing faster than wages, mortgage rates still close to 23-year highs and a shortage of homes nationwide, many Millennials with kids can’t afford it. And Gen Z adults with kids? Even harder.

Meanwhile, Baby Boomers are staying in their larger homes for longer, preferring to age in place and stay active in a neighborhood that’s familiar to them. And even if they sold, where would they go? There is a shortage of smaller homes in those neighborhoods.

As a result, empty-nest Baby Boomers own 28% of large homes — and Milliennials with kids own just 14%, according to a Redfin analysis released Tuesday. Gen Z families own just 0.3% of homes with three bedrooms or more.

  • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    And they want the old people to just leave their homes when their kids move out? As if there aren’t tons of other reasons to stay in your home.

    It’s a weird article that’s trying to put generations against each other.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not that weird. The corporate media has been pushing this narrative for a while. They realize that younger people don’t respond to the old racism or anti-lgbtq. But “evil old boomers are stealing your house/money/whatever” seems to work like a charm. It’s just another distraction.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The actual solution is to build more and reject the idea that homes should be a monetary investment (because that requires limited supply, which requires that somebody who needs a home in an area can’t get it in order to make demand drive the price up)

        • Coreidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It really isn’t the solution.

          I would totally agree with you if it weren’t for the fact that there is an abysmal amount of vacant homes.

          Investment companies buy up entire neighborhoods leaving them empty allowing them to jack prices up in the area for rentals.

          This has nothing to do with there being not enough homes. The issue is investment companies turning housing into a monopoly.

          Building more won’t do shit because investment firms will gobble those up too. New homes are mad expensive too so the only people affording them are rich people or investment firms.

          Remove Wall Street from housing and the problem is solved.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Investment companies does make it worse, but they wouldn’t be able to cause a crisis if homes were built in such volumes that they can’t be investments. They’re buying expecting value to go up. Build enough and that can’t happen.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Right, we had the same issue before investment companies got big, and before airBnB. They just made it worse and the jump in interest rates made houses suddenly even less affordable

              As someone who does have a house, I wanted to start pre-paying my mortgage so that’s not hanging over my head so long. However with interest rates as low as they are, I’m much better off even just dropping but I to a savings account …. Anyhow, my point is that even if I wanted to sell, such as to downsize, that’s a bad deal given interest rates