There’s something deeply wrong with that person to collect random and mundane comments as if it’s a catalogue of curiosities. I’m more amazed the instance doesn’t seem to care about hosting this kind of community on their website. It’s going to lead to doxxing, and they’ll act like they could have never predicted it.
Funny though that they call themselves a welcoming instance and then allow this kind of crap on their server.
if you wanna blablabla about Laowhy you better bring proof
No, I don’t think I will.
Rules-based order: we make the rules, you take the orders.
just another lib instance that is no different from lemmee or world, they’re all trying to be the same.
with how much they’re reading lemmygrad I’m tempted to post quotes and links to theory at the end of my comments
I thought he was from world, they seem to be slightly better at moderating on lemmee.
Interesting project. I would have suggested that @bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml join your mastodon instance since you get 2000 characters per “toot” (weird choice of word tbh), which is not bad at all for shorter writings and you can arrange them into a thread.
The problem with having a blog or any platform is getting people to read you, social media is a powerful tool to get eyes on your content.
Substack is also becoming very popular, I think because you manage your blog space however you like.
And on ProleWiki we’re looking at opening a sort of blog space too for our editors to replace the legacy essays page (which is just a page with a table in it). But you’ll need an editor account and we have no release date at all, we’re still playing around with the idea.
Lemmy world is considering defederating from us due to the “same reasons” as Hexbear. They will go on the wall of shame, they couldn’t handle our facts. But on the upside you’ll see much fewer libs 😁
Also remember that you speak mostly for the audience. You talk to one person in a debate, but plenty of people listen and that’s where the real reach is. We have actually already brought some people over with our arguments, as I’ve seen in comments and account requests. I don’t want to pretend there’s been dozens of people joining over this, but there’s certainly been some.
edit: but you are justified in not engaging with them either.
Waiting for lemmee to ban him over this like
thinking they’d be allowed to just shitpost all day and not slave away for their dictator
so just like capitalism?
Get back to work wage slave, your contractual lunch break is 30 minutes, not 31, and the excel sheets aren’t going to make themselves. I need them in my inbox by 4 so I can take credit for them at the meeting.
I want to change my previous comment, you should have quoted a lower random price and when she disagreed say “the numbers don’t agree with your price, mine makes more sense”
The fact remains you can start new parties that aren’t capitalist and advocate their views as long as you are not advocating violence.
That is ahistorical. As a polisci major you should have learned about McCarthyism.
The issue is that capitalism has made itself indissoluble. Capitalism is very good at co-opting any threat and integrating it into it. Like how you can buy Leninade in the US (which I hear is just mid). Well, except fascism lol (cf 1945).
Any revolutionary message can be made into a commodity to be bought and sold, reduced to its simple exchange value – which is something Marx talked about extensively.
Capitalism doesn’t need to jail people for speaking up against it. It can defang them completely and integrate their message in the pursuit of profit. Like how Just Stop Oil is being funded by an oil heiress. Was the USSR at a same developmental stage that they could allow people to “suggest” a completely different system?
And the proof this mechanism is working… is that we’re having this conversation. Vocal disagreement with capitalism is useless. It does not materially do anything against capitalism. Whenever we turn that disagreement into action and get slightly too close, that’s when the arm of the state comes up to ban our parties (authoritarian by your definition), jail us (authoritarian by your definition), close down our media outlets (authoritarian by your definition) and even sometimes team up with fascists to assassinate us (authoritarian by your definition).
But try suggesting in 1790s France that you should have a king again.
And the DPRK isn’t even communist it is a hereditary monarchy masking as “communist” where you cannot suggest a new leader within the party
The DPRK is led by a coalition of three parties; the Social-Democrats, the Chongdu party (religious), and the Workers’ Party. I dread to see what they teach you in your polisci degree because this is pretty fundamental stuff about the DPRK, even Wikipedia talks about it, it’s not like it’s some super obscure factoid.
>mfw when i don’t get a joke that i am not supposed to get
In which this fool does not understand federation and that we do not suffer him, we tolerate him. Well, tolerated.
being a member of the CPC comes with duties and other obligations because you represent the state. For example you should be married before joining or at least in a relationship because they don’t want you to date around due to the power implications (you being a member and the people you date not being members).
It’s not like joining a party in liberal democracies where you just pay the dues and then do whatever.
The spirits are not cheap 😅
Even as a web designer I didn’t charge that much per hour
call them an auditorium, the way they’re projecting we could be watching the Great Gatsby in imax.