Use your brain Norman.

I never know if this is a meme or if this is actually who Earnhardt was.

This is great! I self host something called Shiori which basically gives me the FF Readability + an archive is a shareable form, but these tools also mean I can easily convert those articles into audio files too. A+

They don’t think that’s what it means. They know it means publicly funded. They just don’t want to pay for it because they know the rich will be fitting the bill. Don’t give them that much credit, they’re not as dumb as they want you to think.

Then replace woodworking with abortion and you no longer need to imagine it happening, you can watch it live in 4K.

You can make this same statement, which I don’t disagree with, about every film. It’s technically correct, which is the more boring kind of correct. Since most Normans are not at that point on the ideological world view scale, the movie exists in a whole different context for them. I think giving the Norman cultural context, this movie is subversive by that standard. It exists in a state of equilibrium between corporate revisionism and subversive cultural critique. Any tip of the scale in one direction or the other leads to either a vapid mass market blockbuster or a wildly unwatchable but biting satire that no one bothers to see.

We could discuss those ideas, but I think you would need to see the film in order to critique it for it’s content. Otherwise, we can return to the time honored traditions and write long winded shibboleths back and forth to each other, like two squawking crows at dawn, broadcasting our belief systems to the greater murder, without really saying anything of substance.

You’ll have fun, for sure. I’m interested in Oppenheimer but I have a strong feeling it’s very revisionist and likely wreaks of character rehabilitation. I’m sure it’ll be a gorgeous film.

PG-13 – Parents Strongly Cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13. Parents are urged to be cautious. Some material may be inappropriate for pre-teenagers.

It’s not a restriction by age it’s a warning about content, but it’s left to the parents to decide if it’s appropriate.

I think it would be an interesting project for sure.

I say do it!

What do you think PG means in PG-13? Perfectly Good?

And they should.

I’m sorry you seem to be missing my greater point here: Our daughters will be sexualized by a man even while they are still children, not just teens, robbing them of their childhood innocence, which is far more damning then me or you taking them to see the Barbie move… Where most of the films message will fly right over there heads, but could create an opportunity to have a conversation about the fact above.

Lol man, every women I know has a story about being sexualized by an adult man when they were a child. Every, single, one. None of these men were considering wether it was the time and the place to shatter their innocence. That seems like more of a real threat then the “ideologies” of the Barbie movie.

Yeah this feels deeply classist and anti-solidarity. “My channel isnt for the poor and never has been”. Pretty shit message when you consider the things he is advocating for will uplift the poor and working class higher then anyone else. “We should have affordable public transportation options” but also “not in your city you filthy poor, it’s to late for you. Sorry bucko.”

Yeah I guess the compsci professor wanted nothing to do with it. I wish Drew could have kept making Cloth Map. Such a cool video series.

⚰️

We visited the Hiroshima memorial when we were in Japan. They had videos rolling of survivors and their experience. Such a grotesque act of violence, something we should have made reparations for a long time ago.

Yeah the more I dig through the videos the more it looks like textbook Miami Cuban Republican nonsense. Lol homegirl saying she has a polisci degree and saying trump isn’t a fascist.

It makes me wonder how many of the comments they get are legit or just bot spam. I guess there isn’t much of a difference.