• 1 Post
  • 886 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 12th, 2024

help-circle




  • If you think about it from an evolutionary standpoint it’s perfectly logical.

    This hasn’t actually been borne out in science. As a general rule, less complex human societies tended to be more willing to cooperate with outsiders. They shared hunting grounds, traded clan members, came together for more complex endeavors, and so on. It isn’t until the advent of agriculture, when people became attached to plots of land and felt the need to defend them from others, that we see these default attitudes start to shift - and racism as we understand it today is a thoroughly modern phenomenon, with no antecedent prior to the 17th century.












  • I think the awful nature of competitive online games specifically started with the introduction of matchmaking. The way it works now, the entire process of forming a team and playing the game is as depersonalized as it is possible to be, which studies show brings out the absolute worst in people. Prior to that, playing a competitive team game was a social activity - you had to join a guild or a clan, you had to arrange play time and get to know your teammates, you probably knew your opponents as well because you would do clan wars or whatever with the same rotating groups, and you were playing on smaller servers with a higher ratio of moderators so that people who were assholes (or cheaters) would be corrected or banned more easily.

    Even if you weren’t doing organized team play, just playing longer sessions with the same group of people while the teams shuffle every match is better at passively encouraging good behavior because everyone in the server is building a reputation and rapport with each other. It wasn’t perfect of course, gamers were still Gamers back in the day so there was no shortage of shitty behavior, but it was definitely better than what we have now.