safe at home behind a screen.

You have to define safe here. Investing in starting a business, even one involving sitting behind a screen and writing code, involves a appreciable amount of risk of losing your money. In no way is that person in a position of safety.

I would actually like to see if gen Z are more risk averse when it comes to participating in adventure sports - mountain climbing/rock climbing, skydiving, rafting in fast flowing water, etc

I urge people to please read the article. When you read it properly, you can see that it mentions that Gen Z are emotionally risk averse but says nothing about their risk taking in other avenues like finance, entrepreneurship, career direction, etc.

In fact, the Forbes article clearly shows how Gen Z are taking more risks in entrepreneurship and work related activities.

Can you even sleep with a tech priest¿? What if the required anatomical parts have been replaced by metal because ‘flesh is weak and prone to wither’

Is it the same for Italy and Cypress¿?

Those are trains not trams

How is this cheaper than the EV3¿?

Edit : I am asking this genuinely as it seems this is larger in every dimension and has a bigger battery as well

But conservatives are terrified of their neighbors, for some reason. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Can’t blame them. Most conservatives in the USA are unstable, gun wielding nuts.

They went all in on aerodynamics to make the car as efficient as possible. That meant having smooth curves and a raindrop/pebble type shape. The looks are polarizing(codeword for shit) but it is actually pretty efficient so they did achieve their target

To be fair odegaard did trip him before the slip just cucurella didnt go down

ask trossard

He’s good. Let’s hope next year’s car is also good

This could be promising depending on how well they implement quality control. Currently, this is where Indian manufacturers struggle

I confirm that the same things happens for me

That goal difference gap is stunning

It’s a sync problem I guess because lemmy-ui (the default UI developed by the Lemmy devs) and Photon (Lemmy client website) and Voyager (Lemmy client app) all show the bullet points properly

There are several reasons

• The car got lighter as the fuel was consumed throughout the race
• It was raining earlier which made the track wet and led to lower grip. Near the end of the race, the track was dryer (still wet but not nearly as wet as earlier in the race) which meant the drivers had more grip.
• The tyres didnt wear much because the rain dropped the track temperature. This meant that the grip increase from the track getting drier was more than the grip lost due to tyre wear allowing the cars to go faster.

The VSC was luck. Pitting neither under the VSC nor under the safety car was a strategic call. Red bull and Alpine both made an educated guess based on the amount rain that there is a high possibility for a red flag. It was lucky but there was plenty of strategy involved. Also all three of them drove brilliantly to put themselves in a position to capitalise. Remember Colapinto binned it on fresh inters while max, ocon and gasly kept it on the track on won’t worn inters. Saying it was 100% luck is doing a disservice to all 3 of them and their teams

The ultra 7 is actually a good all rounder. Decent performance (well balanced between gaming and production workloads), good efficiency and good pricing with respect to the AMD options. AMD is of course better for pure productivity (9950x), pure gaming (7800x3d and the upcoming 9800x3d) and is better at the low end (7600, 7600x)

Why though??

The result wouldn’t have changed much even with all the guilty parties rightfully recieving a 5 sec penalty. Russell would still be 3rd 4th, Norris would still be 6th, Yuki would still be 7th, piastri would still be 8th and ollie would still be 12th. The only beneficiary would be perez who would move upto 9th after the penalties for lawson and lewis who would drop to 10th and 11th respectively.