• Bob Robertson IX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Awesome! Now do it to keep the cops from being able to force you to unlock your phone under duress.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      You intentionally fail the biometrics a few times so it locks the device and requires the pin/password. From there it depends on the country. In the US, they can’t force you to give up a password, but they can force biometrics. If your country doesn’t legally protect you then there’s no software measure that can’t protect you at that point.

        • cum@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          While that’s the strongest security option in that situation, it might cause more problems if they are forcing you to unlock your phone in front of them and you’re being observed. Same issue with the lockdown feature. Failing the fingerprint intentionally is invisible to the hostile observer and let’s you feign ignorance as to why you phone got locked.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s an interesting idea. Pick a weird finger for the biometrics and intentionally use the wrong one if you’re under duress. Fake surprise and astonishment until the device forces you to enter your pin.

        What, the cops are going to force you to use the specific correct finger? Great unexpected idea to still use biometrics and have some protection from being compelled to provide your fingerprint.