• dependencyinjection
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s cute that you think 25% of your sale is going towards labour, even before self-checkouts became so commonplace.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Its cute that you are trying to twist what I said into something that I didnt say.

      No wait, not cute. the opposite of that.

      I said I want a 25% discount for doing their job and saving them the labor. Not that their labor is 25% of my bill.

      • dependencyinjection
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m sorry you’ve taken offence to my throw away comment, as no offence was meant.

          • dependencyinjection
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It is not and I was not meaning to be condescending.

            I was trying to add a little humour, clearly I’m not funny. It’s not that deep.

      • dependencyinjection
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have no clue. I guess you can look at the profit margin for a supermarket (Walmart is around 2%, I just checked), then figure out the average full food shop spend, and finally see what the average hourly wage is for a worker and how long it would take to ring up a full shop.

        Although, this also highlights why they can’t give OP 25% off as their margin isn’t anywhere near this figure. I guess we should also factor in handouts that companies like Walmart get from the government to subsidise their staff etc.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          From reading a few reports, after looking this up, it seems walmart spend about 7% of it’s revenue on hiring, and about 32% on payroll. The other costs towards labor seem to vary greatly from source to source, depending on exactly what they take into consideration as a labor expense. So it is somewhere between 39% and 60% of the revenue.

          • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So that other person was probably being super condescending for no reason? That’s kind of the impression I got when they said they had no idea the actual number.

            • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              maybe? don’t know, wouldn’t be surprised if they just actually didn’t know, and made an assumption based on some information they had. Also wouldn’t be surprised if they were being condescending. meh