MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 hours agoMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayimagemessage-square158fedilinkarrow-up1881arrow-down116
arrow-up1865arrow-down1imageMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 hours agomessage-square158fedilink
minus-squarefallingcatslinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·8 hours agoIt works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·5 hours agoIt works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
minus-squareFridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·38 minutes agoWell, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol
minus-squareKitathalla@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 hours agoSlight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
minus-squareevergreen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·52 minutes agoCorrect. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
It works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
It works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
Well, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol
Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.