cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前Gotta stay on brand!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down13cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1476arrow-down1imageGotta stay on brand!lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前message-square12linkfedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squarejmcslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 年前I use it as my own personal “Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish”, and follow up by explaining I’m strongly motivated to find the simplest and most reliable solution for any task.
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 年前Lazy + smart is actually a very useful combo. The problem is lazy + dumb.
minus-squarejmcslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-21 年前The worst is the exactly wrong amount of smart. Dumb people usually have a limit to the damage they can do.
minus-squareNythos@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前Idk man, I reckon I could proper fuck some shit up and I’m pretty dumb
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Hard-working and dumb isn’t great, either. Oh, you did it the most difficult and least efficient way? Congratulations, you’re a “hard worker”.
I use it as my own personal “Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish”, and follow up by explaining I’m strongly motivated to find the simplest and most reliable solution for any task.
Lazy + smart is actually a very useful combo. The problem is lazy + dumb.
The worst is the exactly wrong amount of smart. Dumb people usually have a limit to the damage they can do.
Idk man, I reckon I could proper fuck some shit up and I’m pretty dumb
Hard-working and dumb isn’t great, either.
Oh, you did it the most difficult and least efficient way? Congratulations, you’re a “hard worker”.