• Karyoplasma
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The only thing Stalin had in common with the Nazis was that he was a socialist. But like many oppressive figures, he only liked the idea of socialism because it traps your underlings into dependency which makes them easier to control under a tyrannical rule.

    “He committed atrocities” is not the definition of being a Nazi. If that’s your definition, that’s non-standard and people will misunderstand your points.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nazis weren’t socialist. They picked the title to muddy the water on their actual position. They killed socialists and communists first.

      • Karyoplasma
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Check the 25-point program of the NSDAP. They definitely had socialist points like

        We demand nationalization of all businesses which have been up to the present formed into companies (trusts).

        and

        We demand that the profits from wholesale trade shall be shared out.

        But yeah, once they gained their dictatorship they were more focused on nationalism and killing those they didn’t like.

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            They abused socialist ideas to rise to power, as I have written in my initial post. How did I exactly “get that wrong”?

            Look up Gregor Strasser, Hitler’s right hand until sometime in the early 1930s and then tell me that guy was not a socialist. Which is probably why he got killed during the Night of Long Knives.

            Also look at the poem. Stalin was a communist, so he would have been killed even before the socialists. Saying Stalin was “not too far off from a Nazi” is still something that is in need to be explained lol

            • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              By still laboring under the delusion that lying about having socialist ideas in order to gain power for the purpose of slaughtering socialists somehow makes them socialist.

              • Karyoplasma
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Ok, point taken, I thought it was abundantly clear that I equated the abuse of socialist ideas as the only common factor in the ideology of Hitler and Stalin. I didn’t think it was possible to misconstrue

                But like many oppressive figures, he only liked the idea of socialism because it traps your underlings into dependency which makes them easier to control under a tyrannical rule.

                as calling the Nazis “socialists”. I guess, I was wrong about that.

                Now explain to me how Stalin was “not too far off from a Nazi”?

    • nymwit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      oh wow my first “nazis were socialists” post on lemmy. [bender taking photo “neat”] Place is getting big. I mean that’s how you know you made it to the big leagues.

      • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just like North Korea is democratic. “It’s right there in the name! The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea!” /s, for the stupid.

      • Karyoplasma
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Read the sentence right after the first. Context is important.

        I enjoyed the Futurama reference tho.

    • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      “He committed atrocities” is not the definition of being a Nazi. If that’s your definition, that’s non-standard and people will misunderstand your points.

      That’s the nicest “stop making shit up motherfucker” I’ve seen

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      He was a fascist authoritarian dictator who committed countless atrocities under the guise of “socialism”. He is very much like Hitler, historically. But no, he wasn’t a “Nazi”.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Stalin wasn’t fascist, though. Authoritarian, yes; dictator, yes. Fascism is specifically a far-right ideology, though. It’s not synonymous with authoritarianism or totalitarianism, though those terms overlap.

      • Karyoplasma
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is what I wanted to express. Thank you for making the effort to understand my post.