• DucktorZee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wouldn’t it be great if the US started relocating it’s military bases to other states? I’m sure NM, MI or CA would be happy to have them.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s already happening, because the draconian antitrans and anti-abortion laws are impacting readiness in those states and driving down recruitment.

    • theotherone@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh you mean the 42 town-sized forward operating bases inside the treasonous province? They will come in very handy in the 72 hours it takes to resecure that territory.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        10 months ago

        I always wondered how quick that would go down.

        72 hours seems quick, but I guess they wouldn’t really encounter actual resistance.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah “muh guns” are pretty useless against predator drones and air support

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Both of which are much better for the world than the current main industries of Texas: fossil fuels and fascism.

              • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Houston is the 4th largest city in the country, and generates a shitload of oil revenue. That’s way more important than Austin.

            • Swedneck
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              makes it real easy to justify liberating it then, doesn’t it? most of the people living there want to remain part of the US.

      • dlpkl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Do people really think that the servicemen in the military would willingly attack Texans? I have a huge suspicion that they’d revolt within the armed forces.

        • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          As someone currently serving active duty, yes - depending on the command climate and the servicemember. Especially if the targets are labeled as insurgents and a VEO threat with credible evidence. Now, bombing noncombatant civilians is a different story, but as far as conducting surgical strikes on domestic terrorists, no hesitation.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        10 months ago

        If it’s anything like the rest, they just leave toxic fuel spills to slowly seep into all the aquifers

        • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          10 months ago

          Perfect. Texas loves not having environmental regulations, so there shouldn’t be any issue!

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            10 months ago

            lol their power grid is already so fucked that key strikes against it would leave them wondering if it was part of the combat or if it had just failed of its own accord