nifty@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-21 年前The first reason should be enoughlemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1532arrow-down111cross-posted to: rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
arrow-up1521arrow-down1imageThe first reason should be enoughlemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-21 年前message-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
minus-squaremogoh@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 年前I don’t know. I played 3.5 and 5e and I like the 5e rules way more than 3.5. Isn’t PF very close to 3.5?
minus-squarevithigar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 年前First edition Pathfinder was very close to 3.5. Many people called it 3.75e. While some of the D&D bones are still there, Second edition Pathfinder is very much its own thing.
I don’t know. I played 3.5 and 5e and I like the 5e rules way more than 3.5. Isn’t PF very close to 3.5?
First edition Pathfinder was very close to 3.5. Many people called it 3.75e.
While some of the D&D bones are still there, Second edition Pathfinder is very much its own thing.