• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Obviously they are doing this to villify immigrants and discourage participation in the census, not because they actually care about who counts for the census. Citizenship requirements are intended to scare people who are citizens but often assumed to be non-citizens from participating along with the non-citizens.

    • abrake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      It also diminishes the political power of regions where there are more undocumented immigrants by giving them less representation in the House

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If only they didn’t keep shipping all that political power to blue states just to compete for who can be the biggest turdmonger in the south

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    If the census was just to determine house and electoral vote distribution, I would say go for it! The states with higher number of non-citizens are normally represented by Republicans. If they want to decrease their power, great!

    However, the census is also used for funding allocation for things that help noncitizens. Not counting them would screw up that.

  • bquintb@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Any time a Republican does anything, I first ask myself what a bad-faith actor would do, and it usually turns out to be that thing.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Some Republicans in Congress are pushing to require a citizenship question on the questionnaire for the once-a-decade census and exclude people who aren’t citizens from the count that helps determine political power in the United States.

    But the proposal has set off alarms among redistricting experts, civil rights groups and Democratic lawmakers as a reprise of efforts by the Trump administration to place limits that would dramatically alter the dynamics of the census, which plays a foundational role in the distribution of political power and federal funding.

    That push was seen as an effort to bolster the Republican agenda on immigration before the November elections, with Donald Trump as the party’s presumptive nominee against Democratic President Joe Biden.

    Following that defeat, the government under Trump tried to discern the citizenship status of every U.S. resident through administrative records and sought to exclude people who were in the U.S. illegally from the count used for apportioning congressional seats.

    “We should not reward states and cities that violate federal immigration laws and maintain sanctuary policies with increased Congressional representation,” Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement after the vote.

    If Trump becomes president, his administration could take steps to add a citizenship question without making the procedural mistakes cited by the Supreme Court in its 2019 ruling, said Jeffrey Wice, a redistricting expert.


    The original article contains 754 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        “The most recent time the House of Representatives gained members due to census data was after the 2020 census, which took effect in 2023. The 2020 census results led to five states gaining one seat and Texas gaining two, while seven states lost one seat. The states that gained seats were: Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina, and Oregon.”

        Notice these are NOT blue states.