Well, at least they aren’t outright throwing the functionality in the trash.

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s something to be said about brand recognition, and Google just doesn’t listen.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve heard it’s because creating/reforming things rather than maintaining them is more valued at Google with their current company culture.

      • triptrapper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        A friend who worked at Meta said pretty concisely, “You get rewarded for coming up with something new, not improving something old.”

        • exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Proving once again that it’s usually management that tanks a company… Yet they get the golden parachutes

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          That would make sense why there’s more features than there used to be, but it’s just worse in every way. Same as Google, Reddit, Microsoft, etc…

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s pretty common across most orgs really. Google just seems to have perfected it. Which might actually mean they’ll kill it soon!

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly. The Google culture nowadays is a lot of climbers cynically trying to sell new ideas and then abandoning them once they get promo. It didn’t always used to be like that.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Google: “Thanks for your feedback, we hear you loud in clear. In response, we’ve launched 5 new messenger apps (only 3 available in your region), changed the names and branding of 3 other messengers, and completely discontinued 8 other messenger apps. We hope you enjoy playing our little game of Three Card Monty trying to figure out which messenger actually works now.”

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        My favorite thing about this is I was using Hangouts for SMS messaging for like two years after they said they’d stop supporting it. I don’t know if I just got lucky and someone forgot to turn off a server somewhere or what, but even their inconsistency is inconsistent.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Well, at least they aren’t outright throwing the functionality in the trash.

    Yet

  • five82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not defending Google but I think the change is just an admission that the old “Chromecast” branding is outdated. It wouldn’t surprise me if less than 5% of users still regularly cast from a desktop browser.

    • SkaveRat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would do it more often, if firefox would fucking finally add it into the browser.

      And no, that weird plugin doesn’t count. It’s buggy as hell

      It’s literally the only reason I have chrome installed

      • prograhammingdev@lemmy.prograhamming.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pretty sure they can’t bundle it. AFAIK the libraries required for it ship with Chrome / Android and it’s not an open standard. The hacky weird workarounds are people brute forcing it.

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        How? It’s closed sourced tech. Not like Firefox can just add it, they would have to pay Google for it (and that’s assuming google would license Firefox for this and remove a competitive advantage from Chrome Browser)

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      if less than 5% of users still regularly cast from a desktop browser.

      Wait, I could do that?! It doesn’t matter a ton at the moment, but I might want to do that in future. I’ll have to look into it.

    • batmaniam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      All I know is I appreciate their slow roll. Everytime they break something I replace it with the non-Google option. I’ve got a small nuc as my main HTPC tied into my plex. Been waiting for an excuse to swap my first Gen Google hockey Puck from like 2012 in my bedroom.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t even use their browser and if anything I’d want a full video cable replacement and not just stream specific things.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Imo the old UI was way less clunky than the new one with the remote. You didn’t need to log into anything, just cast to the screen. EZPZ. The new one, you need to install the app on the Chromecast, log in on the Chromecast, then you can cast n it will work maybe 60% of the time with casting. Casting’s broken, but hey, it’s cool, we have apps and a remote now, just use those. The stupid remote gets lost all the time, which obviously wasn’t an issue before because your phone/ laptop was the remote. Google thought ahead though, and added remote functionality to the home app that also works about 60% of the time.

      Tl;dr new Chromecast sucks.

  • bokherif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Crazy to think that even the newest Pixels can’t cast to any device unless you specifically have Chromecast support, which most of the TVs don’t. I can cast my Samsung or iPhone just fine tho

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Shit rolls down the enshitification hill very slowly if it’s hard or if it’s winter. But give it time. I’m sure Google is enshitifying something here.