Strange that the article doesn’t mention that, since Biden claimed executive privilege, Garland can’t turn the audio over.
Well, they seem focused on the absurdity of this whole thing. And of course, it’s a Florida-woman trying to out batshit crazy everyone else.
I just read a little bit about her and she’s basically a female George Santos. i.e lied about almost every aspect of her life to become a representative.
Gross.
Are we sure she isn’t George Santos?
Funny how I knew it was Anna Paulina Luna just from that description. She’s a nutjob.
Over MTG and Boebert???
Sarah Palin was really a trend setter for congesional Republican women.
To be fair, the description included “Florida-woman” so that alone disqualified those other two nutjobs.
Not necessarily in terms of sheer craziness, but the lying about every part of her background is pretty identifying.
Cool, cool, cool - Jim Jordan, too, right?
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I remember hearing once that even if this were to happen, Congress can’t hold him longer than the end of this Congressional term.
More political grandstanding from the party that is bereft of any ideals beyond give the rich more money and worship Trump.
So Congress has one man, with a particular set of skills, tasked with apprehending targets and bringing them to the House floor.
Sounds like a movie idea.
I wonder if Garland regrets waiting two years before prosecuting the top Republican insurrectionist. He’ll never stop being a conservative, but maybe he’ll stop being a Republican.
