Literally barely any games that can’t be played on ps4 or Xbox one.

This ps5 almost feels like a waste of 500 bucks

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    My theory is that there was no reason to make a new generation of consoles, we have reached diminishing returns. People only need their games to look good enough and be big enough and run fast enough, the new generation just doesn’t matter anymore.

    Then again my primary form of gaming is ascii graphics so…

    • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s why we need to make video games that are NOT woke. With huge boobs. Big hair. Big asses and bigger attitudes. To finally show that cute barista with the blue hair that I am a MAN and I will NEVER back down.

      • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        SSD, VRR, and HDR as standard in all consoles was really the upgrade for this generation. Now if Microsoft would just get on board with gyro we could finally make some progress in the controls space.

      • Leper_Messiah [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah the only thing that really impressed me about my ps5 was the load times truly are impressive for someone who never had a gaming pc with an ssd before

        Well, that and Horizon: FW did look real pretty

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      People don’t even need games to look good enough, the biggest breakout hit of the year is just a mismatched Unreal stock asset forest that runs like ass, but what matters is they put Pokemon in it so 15 million sales.

    • dumpster_dove [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t really make sense to force out a new generation of consoles for sales either, considering they’re often sold at a loss. I guess for player retention?

      • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I never owned a console from the PS4/Xbone generation because they sucked so much. I ended up getting a PS5 and even if most of the games I play are also on PS4, they run better with much faster load times.

        • dumpster_dove [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not always, but quite often

          Found this with a quick search (pcmag)

          Typically, when a new games console launches its price point is below the actual cost of manufacturing. But over time, through a combination of bulk component orders and the refining of the hardware design, the cost falls below the retail price. The PS3 was sold at a loss for nearly four years, the PS4 was profitable within six months of its launch, and the PS5 has taken eight months. Considering the novel new design and global chip shortages, that’s quite impressive.

          Microsoft doesn’t share Xbox hardware sales figures and has recently stated no Xbox console has ever turned a profit for the company

    • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Actually I gotta say this is very untrue. You coulda kept making games for the PS4, but not only does it have 7GB of memory to share, but its CPU cores are Jaguar architecture, made for netbooks in 2013. They are literally worse than AMD’s own poor-performance FX CPUs from 2011, which is why stuff like System Shock remake runs 30fps on PS4/XBO but can hit 60 on a fourteen year old PC.

      So while I agree largely about diminishing returns and that the new consoles are hopped up BS, (and their hardware is now even inadequate for many badly optimised games) the PS4 and XBO were not very good hardware c: The PS3 and 360 were similarly poor.

      There is I think no reason to ever replace the PS5 or Series X; they have RDNA2 graphics, eight-core Ryzen 2 CPUs, 16GB of memory and extremely fast NVME storage. Unlike previous generations they are balanced and well-rounded.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      the PS2 was famously long lived, with new games coming out for it years after the PS3’s release. I think if Sony really wanted to force people to upgrade they could just do so by fiat, but historically they just haven’t wanted to, preferring to release the next gen as a high-end upgrade at first, and only later releasing a variant that’s within most peoples’ budgets.

    • Mousy [they/them, love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      My theory is that there was no reason to make a new generation of consoles

      This is how microsoft and to a certain extent sony see it. With proprietary hardware more so being a thing of the past and the future being game pass or total bazinga shit like cloud streaming.