• jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m amazed that they finally mentioned Israel in the headline. You’d expect the BBC to write something like ‘West Bank village burns down’.

      • unexposedhazard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Nah thats not fair to the BBC. They were fairly neutral on this and refrained from calling hamas a terrorist org until they were heavily pressured into doing so. They constantly get bullied by zionists for not being pro israel enough. Yes they could do better, but they are much more neutral than most.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m referring to examples like this headline where they completely left out the perpetrator of an atrocity.

          Even the ‘fixed’ headline makes it sound like the dog somehow got loose instead of being intentionally sicced on the victim.

          • unexposedhazard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Damn that is more examples than i would have thought. Sad to see :/