“Giving people more viable alternatives to driving means more people will choose not to drive, so there will be fewer cars on the road, reducing traffic for drivers.”

Concise, easy to understand, and accurate. I have used it at least a dozen times and it is remarkable how well it works.

Also—

“A bus is about twice as long as a car so it only needs to have four to six passengers on board to be more efficient than two cars.”

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Usable mass transit 20km from the city? Now that would be nice. But it is still science fiction for most people. Today you are lucky if you have working mass transit just inside the city limits.

    • Swedneck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      there are places other than america you know

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I am definitely not talking about America. Other countries can have f-up-ed public transport, too!

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is on the bases that mass transit got the kind of investment that road infrastructure currently enjoys.

      It’s a commentary about spending priorities.