Earlier this month, Borderlands arrived in theaters to horrendous reviews and bad box office numbers. At the time, many assumed it might be the biggest cinematic dud of 2024. But, that title is now held by the newly released Crow reboot.

The idea of rebooting The Crow was already a strange and controversial one. Sure, the original 1994 film was a small but profitable hit, but it is more widely known for the tragedy surrounding the death of Brandon Lee during its production. The following sequels to the OG Crow failed to find success. Most people believed it was wrong to even reboot the series. Yet, Hollywood went ahead and made a reboot anyway. And what do you know, it’s flopping hard!

The Crow reboot released on August 23 to negative reviews from critics and moviegoers. After its opening weekend, it only earned $4.6 million domestically at the box office. Yikes! In comparison, Borderlands made over $8.5 million during its first weekend.

After about five days in theaters, The Crow has made less than $10 million. Meanwhile, Borderlands—which is reportedly already getting a home release in late August—is sitting at a cool $25 million worldwide at the box office.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Do we have the budget for the Crow? It definitely seems cheaper with that lame ending, but they didn’t spend no money on advertising either.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    has anyone past the 90s been able to pull off anything even remotely “goth”?

    • deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, the Visigothic Kingdom lasted for 30 more years after 690, so I’m inclined to say yes.

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Type O Negative had two albums in the 2000’s, and they were only OK (especially compared to their 90’s albums), but I’d say they still count as “pulling off something remotely ‘goth’”

      Plus, Nine Inch Nails has some good stuff in the aughts, and Trent Reznor’s brand of industrial rock is definitely “goth-adjacent,” as are My Chemical Romance’s The Black Parade (2006, I think) and AFI’s Sing the Sorrow (2003), which are both great albums.

      And in more recent music, the band Creeper is really killing it. Their rock opera Sex, Death, and the Infinite Void is very goth and it’s amazingly good (especially as someone who turned his nose up at pop-punk as a kid).

      In non-music media, there have been some really good comics with goth aesthetics in the last 20 years, and I can give some good recs if anyone is interested.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        i was never goth, i don’t know what the minimum brooding darkness threshold is, but i hung around goths enough in the 90s to be pretty sure batman would not be considered goth. anne rice crap = definitely goth. the crow remake = definitely NOT goth

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Man the new Interview with a Vampire is definitely goth.

          Goth generally doesn’t have an uplifting single hero but a bunch of people all collectively wallowing in the mud of sorrow together vibe to it as someone that is basically pastel goth.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve heard about both of these releases for the first time recently and had no idea they were out, so problem number 1 identified.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, how do you typically hear about movies? I saw trailers for both at the last movie I was at, and Borderlands had a pretty big ad run.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah I never go to theaters. I hadn’t heard anything about the crow but borderlands was pretty much unavoidable. I saw ads for that thing absolutely everywhere.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t go to movies very often, but I might if I heard more about what is playing. Targeting ads at people already viewing them regularly seems unsustainable.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            But if they stop going at any point then they stop hearing about it. Its a naturally shrinking demographic.

            You need to reach out to new audiences to replace old ones. We need ads at locations and on platforms frequented by youth (under 30) to see good box office returns for obscure films.

      • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Since I don’t go to the theater, watch tv, use adblock on the internet, and don’t follow any movie related news sources… I learn about movies by people complaining about how bad they are.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Problems 1 and 2 are: no-one thought this was a good idea when they were announced and that turned out to be the case. Not letting people know was them cutting their losses - Borderlands ad spend was very much lower than a film of that budget should have had and it’s likely down to the fact that they knew it’d crash and burn so they didn’t want to throw good money after bad.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I thought it was a good idea when it was Jason Momoa as The Crow but that’s just cause I think he is a secret emo and it would have been funny.

      • SineSwiper
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why create bad movies? It’s a waste of money in the first place.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well the Borderlands movie gave a bunch of Hollywood socialites a vacation in Budapest before the covid restrictions were completely released in California… So probably for reasons like that.

        • Die4Ever@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well they don’t always know ahead of time the movie will be bad, but once the movie is finished or nearly finished they can watch the movie and decide if it’s worth a lot of marketing or not

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because our metric for good and bad is whether or not a large number of people payed to see it.

        Hollywood Accounting might see it as a loss, but sometimes they seem to want to kill a project for shits and giggles, like they did to Treasure Planet.

        You want to know how to make almost every movie a good movie? Target the correct audiences.

  • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like hardly anybody except hardcore movie fans knew this movie was coming out until the eve of its release. This is surely still a massive flop, but it ain’t surprising.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The trailers have been running for a while and it has been talked about on social media quite a bit (rarely in a good light). I also assume it would be on the radar of fans of the games but I suspect most announcements would have annoyed them (quite who the target audience was is a mystery).

  • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ooooh Eric from The Regulation Podcast will be feeling this. He spent double the points on The Crow that Andrew spent on Twisters 😂

  • blackfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are 3 other Crow films that people just forget about. For some weird reason. I don’t know why this one gets so much hate. They should totally build out the Crow universe

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Huh? It gets so much hate cause it’s unnecessary and apparently crap. And you’re saying they should do more of this??

      • blackfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        What the other 2 Crow films they weren’t great compared to the original either doesn’t mean you cant try something.