Rewriting the headling: āMost Americans Donāt Understand Nuance.ā
Article body, summarized: āPeople are too stupid to understand that you can disagree with a candidateās stance but still recognize that theyāre a better choice than the fascist, sexist, predatory, federally indicted criminal.ā
News at 11.
Yep. Itās like how you say āIām voting for Harris but I donāt like her track record of issues important to me, but sheās not Trump and thatās what matters.ā and people instantly harass you into being okay with fracking and murder.
I feel like a lot of this is Russian bots stirring shit up, Israel is the perfect thing to get people not to vote at all, which is exactly what they want, thatās basically a vote for trump but people are either too privileged or stupid to realize it
Hey Iām voting for Harris, I just think its important to call out bad takes from anyone, including those who I vote for. I do it for my local and my federal offices. I email my republican congress members (they donāt respond beyond the default robot reply) and I complain to my democratic senators.
Anything I donāt like is foreign interference, Iām okay with voting for a candidate that endorses genocide, anyone that doesnāt share my views is stupid
Hell yeah brother. Iām also proud to be a part of the freest country in the universe. šMoreštransšdronešpilotsš
Genocide or fascism+genocide, pick one, because those are your two choices at the moment, and not picking counts as a vote for fascism+genocide
Grow up
I live in one of the reddest states in the country, my vote literally doesnāt matter. Thanks democracy
āMost Americans Donāt Understand Nuance.ā
Most people, regardless of nationality, donāt understand nuance. Thatās why Winston Churchill once said that the biggest argument against democracy is talking to an average person for five minutes.
God damnit, I knew someone would do this. Case in point this is specifically about the American elections, therefore the nuanced implication refers to that.
Yes, this can be extended. But youāre now being inclusive of the rest of the worldās shortcomings for what? The article is about Chappell Roan and the morons bitching about her not endorsing Kamala. Not voters in the UK.
Typical American think their experience is the only universal truth and their group only matters in any discussion.
American exceptionalism never fails; as if Americans are the only ones getting the same problem.
I didnāt argue against that. Nor was it the topic of the article. But go onā¦
deleted by creator
Another correction of the headline:
āYāall Cannot Actually Be This Stupidā: an argument on how people are, in fact, this stupid.
Sure they can. Thatās part of how we got here in the first place.
It certainly doesnāt help that most democrats see any criticism of Kamala as tacit support of Trump.
Thereās criticism, and then thereās ādemocrats and Harris are horrible genocidal people and you are supporting genocide if you vote for themā criticism.
I donāt know of anyone making reasonable and realistic criticism getting downvoted.
I mean, the trouble is that voting for Democrats does literally support genocide, if only because every president and presidential candidate in modern history has promised and/or enacted genocidal policies. When talking about US politics and genocide, the bar is so low, itās in hell.
The nuance to all of the above is that voting for Republicans supports genocide even more. Itās entirely valid to vote for less genocide amongst several genocidal options, and also to call said genocide out.
Well, they certain arent trying hard enough to not look like genocide supporters
As if literally on cueā¦
