The Abandon Harris movement that sprouted late last year out of the widespread outrage over the Biden-Harris administration’s support for the ongoing Israeli war on Gaza has officially endorsed the Green Party’s Jill Stein for US president.

The endorsement is the first of its kind for Stein and the Green Party, with the Abandon Harris campaign being the first major Muslim-led political group to endorse her campaign this election cycle. Last month, a smaller group, the Muslim American Public Affairs Council NC, also endorsed Stein.

“We are not choosing between a greater evil and a lesser evil. We are confronting two destructive forces: one currently overseeing a genocide and another equally committed to continuing it. Both are determined to see it through,” the Abandon Harris campaign said in a statement released on Monday.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If Jill Stein got elected and pulled out of NATO she would be the best US President in history for the Global South. Anyone who understands and agrees with ACAB but supports NATO has no idea about how Capitalism and by extension Imperialism functions.

      • Frog@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Considering being in NATO protects countries from a Russian land grab like what happened in Ukraine, being part of NATO is antiimperialism.

        Russia is genociding Ukrainians. They are also torturing, raping, and murdering POWs, women citizens, and children.

    • banshee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I just wish we had STAR voting so additional candidates wouldn’t increase the risk of Trump winning the election. So many people are either blind to the present danger or they spread misinformation because they hate the US.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Do you believe that third party voters could be perfectly rational and not spread misinformation?

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Is Communism a “disastrous outcome” in your opinion, and genocide perfectly acceptable? You’re being vague yet still slandering.

            • banshee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              No. I believe you sincerely disagree with core tenets of US government and wish the government to be dismantled.

                • banshee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  You’re entitled to that opinion. That’s why I assumed you to be in the latter group.

                  I’m certainly wrong about plenty of things, but I have seen too much violence and hatred grow out of Trump’s first presidency. I do not share your desires for the US.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Explain why Jill Stein got cleared by the Senate Intelligence Committee. Or can you only link a 10 year old picture over and over again? Would be great if you had anything less than 10 years old :)

      Try not to project Kamala Harris being an israeli agent on a third party against Genocide.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Voting for Stein in a FPTP voting system doesn’t solve the problem that’s been turned into a one issue campaign slogan. Even if she was the perfect candidate. The only realistic option is to try and change the stance of one of the two that can win the election, and out of those two choices, suddenly who to vote for is obvious. If it wasn’t already.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The only realistic option (IMO) is to push for state level electoral reform in your respective state. I admit it’s probably to late to get such changes through before the current election without a general strike.

      What are your plans to influence the democratic party?

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The only realistic option is to try and change the stance of one of the two that can win the election

      Which is nearly impossible, ergo it isn’t a solution. Revolution is necessary.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Is Harris going to implement RCV? If not your argument is a red herring.

      You know who is implementing RCV? Jill Stein.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think that’s a Congressional thing, not a President one. But I’m sure she’s promising it. Correct me if it’s something that a President can declare as an executive order, but that wasn’t my impression.

        Btw, I think the way to get RCV federally is to make it statewide, and that’s started already, plus there’s a bill in Congress for the second time.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But I’m sure she’s promising it.

          She’s not, you have been gaslighted. Harris released her platform already there’s no RCV in there.

    • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The only realistic option is to try and change the stance of one of the two that can win the election

      How would you propose to do that while also offering said party an unconditional vote? I’m not American, but if you have an answer it would be useful here too. Parliamentary systems end up pretty much the same.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Protesting, public pressure in other ways, pressure through other representatives in Congress. Also the same to try and get the voting system changed so minority parties can have more effect, bending the major ones to have to talk about issues that for now are easy to avoid (the both sides, even if that’s not entirely true). Another factor is lobbying, that needs to be restricted so large entities like corporations can’t basically buy loyalty.

        I would point out that any vote, even for Stein, is unconditional, so there’s no way to avoid that. To make politicians keep their policy the public has to be engaged past the election.

        Even if all of that is debatable, my main point is that a vote for Stein won’t get any change. One of the two choices that can win the election has some chance, even if small. Whether that be from citizen pressure or them getting the power of office and doing things themselves.

  • basmatii@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Can’t wait for tolerant liberals to go full mask off and claim these Muslims just must not be smart enough to realize the threat of Trump… Again.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      One of said liberals is malding at me right now for pointing out that they are being blatantly racist.

    • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You don’t think Trump is going to be infinitely worse than Harris on this issue in particular?

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Being murdered in a genocide seems about as worse as it can get. Would Trump reanimate the corpses and then murder them again or something?

      • basmatii@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It doesn’t get worse than being genocided, is the point these people are making.

        Both Harris and Trump, equally think Muslims and other unwanted statistically brown people deserve to be subject to genocide and are willing to commit massive amount of funds to that end.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If Trump were doing it you might getout of your chair and materially oppose it rather than making excuses for an imagined lesser evil genocide.

        • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          So you want Trump in office because of that? You don’t care about anything else, I take it?

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I think you should be against genocide and act accordingly rather than buying into the political illogic of your masters. A good start might be letting go of crutches like accusing everyone that calls out tacit support for Democratic genocide a Trump supporter.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        No Trump will be exactly the same. Only the words will be different.

        I do believe Jill Stein will be different though.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Liberals sure seem to be worried people who don’t support Genocide are going to vote for her enough to launch a massive smear campaign.

          • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So glad to hear you will be campaigning in your state for electoral reform! You wouldn’t point out the flaws of First past the post voting and then do nothing to solve the issue would you? Democrats believe in democracy, so it should be a easy sell. Looking forward to your updates!

  • MachineFab812
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I voted for Howie Hawkins last time, certain in the knowlege that Biden would win, Trump would go to jail, and we could hold Biden’s feet to the fire.

    January 6th, and all the related bullshit that’s followed, showed me thah I had made a huge mistake and just got lucky when it comes to the MAGA-crowds coup competence. I will not make that mistake again, not in this election anyways.

    “Abandon Harris” is a shit campaign name. Self-aware guilt, right in the name.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Biden won. Trump is not in Jail. Biden and Harris are committing Genocide.

      I’m not sure where you “realized you were wrong”. If anything you were right to vote for Howie.