• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Technically you’re not wrong. Mainly because there’s no agreed upon technical definition of what does or doesn’t constitute a tree.

    • Swedneck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      the definition of tree is literally just something that looks like a tree: a woody trunk with branches.

      • jol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Most are wrong then. If you can make toothpicks out of it, it’s a tree.

        • flicker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 month ago

          You can make toothpicks out of anything if you’re willing to find a hard bit in it that can be sharpened or whittled.

          Holds up a chicken. Behold! A tree!

        • flora_explora@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nope, that’s not how the definition of a tree works. Look at swednek’s definition in the comments: it is a woody trunk with branches. There are many other plants you could make toothpicks out of (e.g. that are woody) that aren’t trees. For example, shrubs and lianas.