• Phineaz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      See, out of a somewhat displaced curiosity, I’d actually like to see that. Would it turn out the “same” as previous mainly patriarchic autocracies? Would it collapse? Any interesting policies?

      • jmcs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ask Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina was widely considered to be an autocrat.

          • jmcs
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            To put it mildly. But what are few massacres and disappearances between friends.

            And in democracies you also have examples like Thatcher. The problem with the patriarchy is the patriarchy in general, not the genitals of the person in charge.