• unexposedhazard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    So what if there was a noose or blood depicted? Thats none of their business.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Eh. Intentionally incitive clothing is banned for a good reason. You don’t want drama from political rivalry happening in an air bus hours away from an airport.

      I don’t mind the policy of “STFU for X hours until you get to your destination”. This includes people trying to incite you.

      Whether or not this is extreme enough to warrant incoming this rule is another matter. As the person you responded to implied, there may be a way to present that opinion in a highly inciteful way thats not fully realized by the wording alone, so they’re withholding judgement. That seems prudent.

      • magikmw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wearing a call to action about psychiatric health is incitive. Ehh.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t know. I haven’t seen the shirt. That’s the point.

          Just because I agree with the text of the shirt doesn’t mean it’s appropriate to wear in an enclosed area with a bunch of stressed out people known for drama just like this.