• coolmojo@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    3 hours ago

    If someone is interested in AI search, then there is Perplexica which is a self-hosted open source AI powered search engine. It uses your local LLMs instead of OpenAI servers.

  • crank0271@lemmy.worldEnglish
    675·
    15 hours ago

    The best part of this is that every search you run has the same environmental impact as clearcutting the Amazon

  • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.worldEnglish
    34·
    15 hours ago

    Now I’ll finally know how many rocks to eat each day, even if I still won’t know how many Rs are in “strawberry.”

  • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.eeEnglish
    61·
    14 hours ago

    The correct answer to “how to plan a road trip on the Amalfi coast” is

    “Don’t”

  • Sem@lemmy.mlEnglish
    58·
    14 hours ago

    What are benefits of using openai search when we already have Kagi that is much more privacy a friendly, is ads free and provides the same functionality?

      • tiasEnglish
        6·
        9 hours ago

        It’s wild that they are not breaking even with these prices. I’ve had an annual subscription since January and made nearly 5000 searches. Extrapolating to a year, I will have been paying about $0.17 per search. If that would go to the electricity bill then it corresponds to about 1 kWh of energy, enough to run a 50-watt laptop PC for 20 hours.

      • Sem@lemmy.mlEnglish
        45·
        13 hours ago

        My question was about benefits of openai search compared to kagi search. How is this link related to my question?

        • LesserAbe@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          6 hours ago

          The linked post goes into detail about why the author views Kagi as not privacy oriented, and that in the author’s opinion Kagi is overly focused on AI. (And was originally started as an AI company)

          • Sem@lemmy.mlEnglish
            1·
            6 hours ago

            And that is very strange for me. Under the news about AI-search from OpenAI I asked about comparison with AI-search from Kagi, but got a lot of downvotes and a link to the post where the author express his negative opinion about AI.

            • LesserAbe@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              4 hours ago

              I think it would have helped for the person who posted that to include context, but I would guess they were linking because it also talks about how Kagi isn’t privacy focused.

    • Karkitoo@lemmy.mlEnglish
      42·
      13 hours ago

      I’m intrigued by Kagi and maybe I’ll try it. I like the business model of subscription instead of being the product. I don’t mind paying for my privacy. It’s not FOSS though, so we may never know if they’re not reselling our data.