• Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably thinks it’s just a normal servant or slave, not a sexual one.

        • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          To my understanding, that’s the way ancient Romans viewed it. For lack of more delicate and concise words, it manly to top, unmanly to bottom. Gay sex was acceptable if the sexual roles reflected their social roles.

        • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Huh, kind of like the rough and ready good ol boys from Deliverance showing those soft city boys what was what.