• DesertComrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 hours ago

    when republicans lose elections they blame the system or the woke mind virus or immigrants

    when democrats lose elections they blame their own base

    thats the difference

  • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Literally starting to see famous centrist ghouls be like “damn maybe Bernie had a point…” Like they’re shellshocked

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah their whole belief system was just utterly shredded. They’re reeling without any solid ground to stand on, they have no idea what happened or why.

    • Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Democrats on Democrats: Do Not Criticize The Party

      Democrats on the Inscrutable Chinese: In Bad Country, you cannot criticize The Party

  • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yes, the voters suck, but that’s all of them, not just the Trump ones. Every voter has been ignoring a genocide going on for the last year that their country is arming. That should’ve been the first sign that this country and the people in aren’t good, that the people are selfish, that they are primed for fascism.

    You dont care about the Palestinians? Well the Trump voters don’t care about their mothers, daughters, wives, immigrants, minorities, or trans people. It’s the exact same strain of selfishness, just evolved, but it comes from that same seed. Sucks, doesn’t it?

  • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    12 hours ago

    By “my cutiosity” he means a million people dunking on him for being just as willfully ignorant as any Maga

  • NewAcctWhoDis [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    In case you’re wondering just how much this guy sucks

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/im-atheist-israel-hamas-war-102320046.html

    http://archive.today/fLNsP

    And calls from the progressive left for a cease-fire because there have been more Palestinian casualties than Israeli casualties is a bizarre false equivalency that would argue that the penalty for robbing a bank of $500 should be a $500 fine. Israel’s response to the Hamas attack is designed to prevent future attacks, not create a tit for tat that would promote a never-ending state of danger with a terrorist organization whose goal is to finish what Adolf Hitler started.

    • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      True, the penalty for robbing a bank should be levelling the entire neighborhood the robbers lived in. The deaths of the neighbors is the robbers fault, because he was using them as human shields

      • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The fact that he brings up a hypothetical bank robbery for his god awful analogy just highlights why I fucking hate the human shields narrative

        No one would accept it if that excuse was used by cops who responded to a bank robbery even if the robbers were literally using people as human shields

        Anyone who’s willing to shoot through a “human shield” is just a fucking murderer

        Like if I was in a situation where a genuinely bad guy was hiding behind a child I would simply not shoot at the child

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          No one would accept it if that excuse was used by cops who responded to a bank robbery even if the robbers were literally using people as human shields

          No they would, this is where the concept of “Stockholm Syndrome” comes from. There was a bank robbery in Stockholm. The robbers took hostages. The cops and government decided that killing eveyrone to save capitalism was a good idea. The hostages had to negotiate with the government on the robber’s behalf to keep the government from killing everyone, and some of them actually became friends with the robbers.

          Afterwards a psychologist who never spoke to anyone involved decided the only explanation was, pardon my french, “Bitches be crazy” and shat out the idea that the women had fallen in love with their captors because of some incomprehensible mysogynist farting noises.

          Everyone forgot where the concept came from but the idea that stuck and now people believe that if hostages get released thinking their captors had good points it can be safely written off as a mental health problem.