• mustardman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, it’s literally socialism 101 so I wouldn’t expect a tankie to understand.

      • Aliveelectricwire [it/its]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A tankie is a hardline ML in your opinion yes? Did you know most “tankies” read theory to better understand the world and are definitely more knowledgeable than “socialists” (by which you mean libs who aren’t actually socialist like yourself)

        • mustardman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is the worst attempt at Sealioning that I have ever seen.

          Please tell me with full seriousness how redirecting capital from the capital class to the working class is anything other than socialism.

          • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            how redirecting capital from the capital class to the working class is anything other than socialism.

            Theres this concept, where the Capitalists are expropriated from and reproletarianized back into the working class whom in turn seize full control of the means of production and abolish the capitalist governments in order to build governments of/by/for the working class. Thats called building Socialism, and to do anything other than working towards the goal of liquidating the enemies of the working class is to do anything other than fighting for socialism.

            Taking money from the rich and simply redistributing it a la your “profit sharing” does not solve the fundamental contradiction between the capitalist class and the working class as it does nothing to change the economic structure the two exist in opposition to each other. If nothing else. all you’re advocating for is prolonging the existence of Capitalism and fighting against the interests of your own class by advocating for maintaining the cruel system of Capitalism but trying to disguise the worst visages it wears with smiley face emojis

            • mustardman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok. But you have to agree it’s a lot closer to socialism than the status quo.

              • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No lol that’s just welfare - something that can be done regardless of what economic system is in place. Now if you want a discussion on a contrastive analysis of the class dynamics of welfare under a Socialist and Capitalist system, that’d be an interesting topic to research into.

                  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nope, the Soviet Union was Socialist. All other AES projects are also moving towards becoming socialist as well in their own distinctive manner.

                    It doesn’t change you’re a fucking liberal that thinks socialism is when you redistribute wealth without changing the existing economic system.

          • JamesConeZone [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because they don’t own the means of production. Socialism isn’t just redirecting capital, it is about eliminating it and the ruling class. Profit sharing is a bandaid on the grand canyon; workers are still exploited by the capital class. Socialism is a completely and total shift so large and threatening to the ruling class that it can only happen through revolution, it’s way bigger than sharing profits

            • mustardman
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not whataboutism, that was the original argument.

              You guys are the worst trolls in the fediverse.