• frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    There’s no need to give £10 billion to people who don’t need it just because they say they weren’t told about something that they were in fact told about.

    Even if the government had loads of money available — which they don’t — further enriching the wealthiest age cohort is not something they should do. As things stand, they would need to cut, tax or borrow to fund this. No one should be taken seriously unless they can say which of those things the government should do.

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      again and again you reveal a level of dishonesty in your commentary that is quite frankly staggering.

      As I suspect you well know, this is not just a few women who feel cheated :

      The compensation recommendation came in a report from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman earlier this year, which found that the Department for Work and Pensions failed to adequately communicate the changes regarding when women could receive the state pension

      The government accepted a finding of maladministration and apologised, but said it could not justify paying compensation.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Jeremy Corbyn never seems to quite grasp the minutia of a situation. Sure it’s not great that it happened but you have to judge how bad the situation was when calculating a response. The government have already said that they accept responsibility and that it was bad, and that there isn’t any money, sorry.

    It’s not like they face some major injustice, they were slightly inconvenienced. It’s hardly reformation worthy.

    The best outcome for all of this would be that the DWP could marginally improve to be less shit, but realistically I don’t have my hopes up.

  • HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    I feel like I’m missing something here. The law was changed in 1995, to come in to effect from 2010 onwards.

    How is 15 years not enough notice?

  • 1rre
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    “Women against state pension inequality” getting mad that state pension inequality was removed has to be the funniest thing I’ve seen all day

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Like most people they want it to be equal by them getting more. Not them getting less.

      • 1rre
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        They were already getting more, the options were either others get more (which results in them getting less as taxes would increase while gdp decreased) or they get less?

        So they get less either way?

        Sure, it could’ve been handled better but that doesn’t change the fact they’ve got a stupid name for what they’re campaign for

  • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Let’s just abandon retirement and have everyone enjoying the beauty and fulfilment of work until they drop. Bah! Pensions are for the workshy layabouts.