• KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally I don’t get the hype with any of these products. Just because they run Linux by default isn’t a strong enough selling point when I can get better specs for cheaper elsewhere and install Linux myself.

  • Papercrane@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wow almost 2k for a laptop? Ok it has actually good specs, but still it’s alot.

    I checked out the website on my phone and it was a hot mess. Wtf is going on there?

  • anarchotaoist@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not sure about the haptic feedback on the trackpad! I hate it on a phone. It is too jolting! If it is tap to click that is also aweful - at least on Plasma, as the palm rejection is not very good. Hopefully it can be turned off and has a physical click.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have been skeptical of haptic trackpads in the past but they feel great on the Steam Deck

    • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you ever actually tried a haptic touchpad? I have and honestly they are so much better everything else feels like a joke in comparison.

      Also no it won’t have a physical click, that defeats the purpose. It’s also not the same as tap to click, it uses a force sensor.

      • anarchotaoist@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I said above, I have only had haptics on the phone - and I disable it! On a trackpad I want to be the one doing the pushing - not something else! Why exactly is it better? How is it not tap to click - force sensor or not? It is not like using a Theramin is it? Your fingers must be touching/tapping the touchpad, no? On top of that, any bit of interfering palm sensation is a great annoyance that I would rather avoid!

        • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re passionate about something you don’t understand and have never tried.

          Tap to click you remove your finger and press it back down to click. That’s why it’s called tap to click and not press to click.

          With haptic touchpads you keep your finger where it is and apply more force. It’s a completely different gesture and is very similar to mechanical clicking touchpads.

          Why it’s better is because it is consistent across the whole touchpad surface versus mechanical typically don’t work towards the top of the touchpad. Mechanical touchpads normally feel loose to me and you can’t change the actuation force. With a haptic touchpad you can change the actuation force since it’s a force sensor with a software defined threshold.

          It also doesn’t feel anything like phone haptics. It feels more like a press than a vibration like a phone does.

          These are also higher quality touchpads in general that have more resolution. Theoretical even better than the Apple force touch devices I have used.

          Walk into an Apple store and try one of their devices before you complain again.

          • anarchotaoist@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, nice! No, I did not understand, so thanks for your explanation! It makes more sense now! Yes, true, there is nothing worse that a sloppy, loose touchpad. Thanks for the detailed response! 🙏

  • gens@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    At that price, i’d just get a dell…

    Every time it’s the same…

    Why not just make a good enough laptop for a cheap price ?

    • 77slevin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not just make a good enough laptop for a cheap price ?

      You can have a good laptop or a cheap one, not both.

      • gens@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are conflating good and powerfull. The basic 1800£ one from then isnt even that powerfull. Half price from samsung or something would be the same. It’s just not worth it, not by a long shot.

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just be careful with this. I bought a $2k laptop with crypto. When it broke and they refunded me in crypto, it was pegged to the fiat amount. So the price slip meant I lost ~$500 on a 100% refund

  • nelov@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it just me, or is the sound the keyboard is making really bothersome? It sounds like awful banging. Can’t imagine that being pleasant.

  • cmnybo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    It looks like a typical, modern laptop. There’s hardly any ports on it, it uses a non removable lipo battery, and charges with a fragile USB C connector.

    I want a big, swapable battery that uses 18650 cells, a robust charging connector, a full set of audio jacks, ethernet, and lots of USB A connectors. USB C connectors don’t belong on a laptop unless they are easily replaceable like on the framework laptops.

    • Falmarri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      a robust charging connector

      Wtf? Usb-c charging is the best thing that’s happened to laptops this decade. You’re insane to want to go back to the bad times.

      • cmnybo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        The USB C connectors are way easier to break than a large barrel jack and they wear out faster too. If the USB C port is soldered to the motherboard, then you are in for a very expensive repair.

        • const_void@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I used to be in the laptop repair biz. The most common failure mode we saw was the barrel connector. Even ones that were detached from the motherboard like the IBM Thinkpads had.

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Apple mag-connectors are pretty awesome. I’ve never owned a macbook, but I still think those are the cat’s ass.

          • tal@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly, I think that that has less to do with the connector itself and more because the power cord gets yanked.

            I’d assume that you could get a similar effect with any connector, USB included. Well, Apple’s MagSafe ones maybe not, as that’ll just pull the cord away.

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          and they wear out faster too

          The part that wears out is the thing that maintains tension, and that is on the (cheaper, replaceable) cable for USB.

          My understanding that this issue was part of why the move away from mini-USB to micro-USB and later USB-C happened. Mini-USB had the tensioning gizmo on the device, rather than on the cable.

          googles

          Yeah.

          https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/18552/why-was-mini-usb-deprecated-in-favor-of-micro-usb

          Why Micro types offer better durability?

          Accomplished by moving leaf-spring from the PCB receptacle to plug, the most-stressed part is now on the cable side of the connection. Inexpensive cable bears most wear instead of the µUSB device.

        • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe don’t treat expensive hardware like it was made by Fisher Price? Why should consumer electronic manufacters cater to the careless at the cost of conveinence?

    • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using my Thinkpad that only charges over usb-c for 5 years now and the port is still like it was new. Can’t see why this is an issuse, especially that I used to have issues with some barrel port chargers and needed to replace them. On a contrary I now have charger with a plugin so simple that it’s unlikely it will break anytime soon and finding replacement charger is super easy as it is FINALLY a single standard port. I actually have 2 such chargers because of SteamDeck and they both work with both devices. Even if the connector in my laptop broke, there’s second one that I only used few times + replacing it would be easier as it’s not a big deal to find fairly standard connector to be resoldered, and with older laptop chargers there are many different variants of proprietary connectors.

      • tal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a Thinkpad that has both the USB C and the traditional Thinkpad charging port.

        I normally just use the USB C port, but I do like having both available.

        Even if the connector in my laptop broke, there’s second one that I only used few times

        Unless your Thinkpad and mine differ – and maybe they do, given that mine has both the traditional and USB C charging ports, so a total of two – only one of the USB C ports can charge the laptop. On mine, both USB C ports can do USB PD, but one is in/out and the other is out only.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want a big, swapable battery that uses 18650 cells,

      I mean, me too. I think that having less than a 100 Wh battery is nuts, but it’s essentially impossible to find them.

      I think that a couple of things have killed this:

      • Cost. Cutting battery size is an easy way to cut cost, and it’s less-explicit than, say, cutting RAM, as vendors often list a non-standardized “hours of battery life”.

      • USB PD plus external power stations. I think the expectation is that one will get one and having the user just use external ports makes life easier for the vendor and means that they don’t need to deal with counterfeit batteries and such. Also moves heat out of the laptop. I would be more sympathetic to this if there were a standard for a laptop to start automatically drawing from an external USB powerstation when its internal battery gets low, rather than requiring manually-triggering charging.

      • Weight. Apparently some people are super-rabid about laptop weight.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you willing to pay several thousand for a mediocre CPU and no dedicated graphics?

      Because even then they don’t have a chance of making their R&D back.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, it’s what you get when you want an insanely niche product with features 99.99% of the population considers massive downgrades that would make them hesitant to take the product for free.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right. It’s literally impossible for the people working on this to get paid less.

            If they did, they would die.

            Lol. 🤡

            • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you know what’s involved in making the tooling to manufacture a laptop that’s even moderately space effective? It takes a huge amount of work, and the 20 people on the planet who would tolerate using it if they had a gun to their head the whole time can’t cover it.

              • bobman@unilem.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I know that they can make less money and still live a higher quality of life than the vast majority of people on the planet.

                • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Who? Who are you talking about?

                  The people paying for the work to design the product you’re describing would lose hundreds of thousands in the best case scenario, and probably 7 figures. The people doing the actual work on the machines are already making subsistence wages in extremely low cost of living third world countries.

                  Developing products is expensive and takes a lot of time and resources.